H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Sjeng Schalken vs Jan Siemerink H2H: 2-3

Jan Siemerink holds a 3–2 lead over Sjeng Schalken in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Jan Siemerink leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Sjeng Schalken won the 2001 Amsterdam fourth round 3-6 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sjeng Schalken
NED Age 49 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main draw meetings
Jan Siemerink
NED Age 56 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 20, 2001* Amsterdam ATP 250 R16 Clay Sjeng Schalken #32 3-6 6-4 6-4 Jan Siemerink #87 Match data
Jun 21, 2001* S Hertogenbosch ATP 250 R32 Grass Sjeng Schalken #28 6-3 6-4 Jan Siemerink #83 Match data
Jan 17, 2001* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Jan Siemerink #106 2-6 6-3 6-4 3-6 6-3 Sjeng Schalken #27 Match data
Aug 12, 1998* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Jan Siemerink #20 1-6 6-1 7-6(2) Sjeng Schalken #52 Match data
Oct 22, 1997* Stuttgart Masters Masters 1000 R64 Carpet Jan Siemerink #74 6-4 6-2 Sjeng Schalken #54 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sjeng Schalken #677 #11 1,790 1,934 280 254 52.4% 0 0 0 0 9 9
Jan Siemerink #987 #14 1,863 1,908 261 260 50.1% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sjeng Schalken Jan Siemerink
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1994 1–2 33.3% #148 1,501 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1995 17–14 54.8% #69 1,645 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 1996 26–26 50.0% #65 1,687 0 2 — — — — — — —
20 1997 16–25 39.0% #59 1,632 0 3 1990 5–4 55.6% #135 1,541 0 0
21 1998 22–30 42.3% #66 1,592 0 3 1991 30–21 58.8% #26 1,756 0 1
22 1999 28–26 51.9% #44 1,744 0 4 1992 22–26 45.8% #57 1,747 0 1
23 2000 35–26 57.4% #22 1,824 0 5 1993 24–25 49.0% #53 1,670 0 1
24 2001 36–27 57.1% #26 1,846 0 6 1994 16–19 45.7% #81 1,685 0 1
25 2002 36–27 57.1% #20 1,839 0 7 1995 37–29 56.1% #21 1,784 0 1
26 2003 39–23 62.9% #18 1,826 0 9 1996 35–27 56.5% #15 1,866 0 2
27 2004 17–18 48.6% #57 1,698 0 9 1997 18–27 40.0% #78 1,738 0 2
28 2005 7–10 41.2% #230 1,664 0 9 1998 38–24 61.3% #19 1,809 0 4
29 — — — — — — — 1999 17–25 40.5% #88 1,665 0 4
30 — — — — — — — 2000 7–14 33.3% #104 1,576 0 4
31 — — — — — — — 2001 12–17 41.4% #127 1,564 0 4
32 — — — — — — — 2002 0–2 0.0% #438 1,532 0 4