H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Sjeng Schalken vs Jason Stoltenberg H2H: 2-1
Sjeng Schalken holds a 2–1 lead over Jason Stoltenberg in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Sjeng Schalken leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Sjeng Schalken won the 2000 Shanghai fourth round 1-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 49
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 56
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 2000* | Shanghai | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Sjeng Schalken | 1-6 6-3 6-4 | Jason Stoltenberg | Match data |
| Mar 7, 1998* | Scottsdale | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Jason Stoltenberg | 6-3 6-3 | Sjeng Schalken | Match data |
| Feb 27, 1997* | Philadelphia | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Sjeng Schalken | 6-2 6-4 | Jason Stoltenberg | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sjeng Schalken | #677 | #11 | 1,790 | 1,934 | 280 | 254 | 52.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Jason Stoltenberg | #556 | #19 | 1,299 | 1,923 | 294 | 259 | 53.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sjeng Schalken | Jason Stoltenberg | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #413 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1995 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #69 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #70 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1996 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #84 | 1,692 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #59 | 1,632 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #108 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #66 | 1,592 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #75 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #44 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #168 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #22 | 1,824 | 0 | 5 | 1993 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #44 | 1,694 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2001 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #26 | 1,846 | 0 | 6 | 1994 | 38–25 | 60.3% | #21 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2002 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #20 | 1,839 | 0 | 7 | 1995 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #80 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2003 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #18 | 1,826 | 0 | 9 | 1996 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #31 | 1,767 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2004 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #57 | 1,698 | 0 | 9 | 1997 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #79 | 1,768 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2005 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #230 | 1,664 | 0 | 9 | 1998 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #27 | 1,789 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #80 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #66 | 1,689 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #185 | 1,681 | 0 | 4 |