H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Sjeng Schalken vs Jia Ping Xia H2H: 1-0
Sjeng Schalken holds a 1–0 lead over Jia Ping Xia in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sjeng Schalken leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Sjeng Schalken won the 1996 Beijing third round 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 49
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 1996* | Beijing | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Sjeng Schalken | 6-2 7-5 | Jia Ping Xia | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sjeng Schalken | #677 | #11 | 1,790 | 1,934 | 280 | 254 | 52.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Jia Ping Xia | #1,379 | #252 | 101 | 1,500 | 0 | 8 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Sjeng Schalken | Jia Ping Xia | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #353 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #69 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #600 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #522 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #59 | 1,632 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #66 | 1,592 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #617 | 1,423 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #44 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #22 | 1,824 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #26 | 1,846 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #20 | 1,839 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #18 | 1,826 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #57 | 1,698 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #230 | 1,664 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |