H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Sjeng Schalken vs Jim Courier H2H: 1-3
Jim Courier holds a 3–1 lead over Sjeng Schalken in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Jim Courier leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Sjeng Schalken leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Jim Courier won the 1999 Wimbledon third round 7-6(2) 3-6 3-6 7-5 13-11.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 49
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 1999* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Jim Courier | 7-6(2) 3-6 3-6 7-5 13-11 | Sjeng Schalken | Match data |
| Jan 15, 1997* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Jim Courier | 6-7(4) 6-3 4-6 6-1 8-6 | Sjeng Schalken | Match data |
| Jan 2, 1997* | Doha | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jim Courier | 7-6(10) 7-5 | Sjeng Schalken | Match data |
| Nov 8, 1996* | Moscow | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Sjeng Schalken | 6-4 7-6(5) | Jim Courier | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sjeng Schalken | #677 | #11 | 1,790 | 1,934 | 280 | 254 | 52.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Jim Courier | #728 | #1 | 3,973 | 2,218 | 487 | 222 | 68.7% | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 23 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sjeng Schalken | Jim Courier | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #346 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #43 | 1,712 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1995 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #69 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #24 | 1,880 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1996 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #25 | 1,861 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1997 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #59 | 1,632 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 57–17 | 77.0% | #2 | 2,047 | 1 | 4 |
| 21 | 1998 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #66 | 1,592 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 66–15 | 81.5% | #1 | 2,086 | 3 | 9 |
| 22 | 1999 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #44 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 58–17 | 77.3% | #3 | 1,959 | 4 | 14 |
| 23 | 2000 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #22 | 1,824 | 0 | 5 | 1994 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #13 | 1,888 | 4 | 14 |
| 24 | 2001 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #26 | 1,846 | 0 | 6 | 1995 | 59–20 | 74.7% | #8 | 1,988 | 4 | 18 |
| 25 | 2002 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #20 | 1,839 | 0 | 7 | 1996 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #26 | 1,848 | 4 | 19 |
| 26 | 2003 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #18 | 1,826 | 0 | 9 | 1997 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #21 | 1,827 | 4 | 22 |
| 27 | 2004 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #57 | 1,698 | 0 | 9 | 1998 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #77 | 1,738 | 4 | 23 |
| 28 | 2005 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #230 | 1,664 | 0 | 9 | 1999 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #32 | 1,795 | 4 | 23 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #290 | 1,737 | 4 | 23 |