H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Sjeng Schalken vs Jonas Bjorkman H2H: 3-2

Sjeng Schalken holds a 3–2 lead over Jonas Bjorkman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Jonas Bjorkman leads 2–0 on grass, while Sjeng Schalken leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Sjeng Schalken won the 2005 Milan third round 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sjeng Schalken
NED Age 49 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Jonas Bjorkman
SWE Age 54 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 3, 2005* Milan ATP 250 R32 Carpet Sjeng Schalken #79 6-2 6-2 Jonas Bjorkman #70 Match data
Jun 14, 2001* Halle ATP 250 R32 Grass Jonas Bjorkman #42 6-1 6-4 Sjeng Schalken #29 Match data
Apr 19, 2000* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Sjeng Schalken #50 6-4 6-2 Jonas Bjorkman #85 Match data
Mar 10, 1999* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Sjeng Schalken #64 1-6 7-6(4) 7-6(6) Jonas Bjorkman #36 Match data
Jun 14, 1996* Rosmalen ATP 250 R16 Grass Jonas Bjorkman #69 6-1 4-6 6-2 Sjeng Schalken #57 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sjeng Schalken #677 #11 1,790 1,934 280 254 52.4% 0 0 0 0 9 9
Jonas Bjorkman #685 #4 3,022 2,036 395 341 53.7% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sjeng Schalken Jonas Bjorkman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1994 1–2 33.3% #148 1,501 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1995 17–14 54.8% #69 1,645 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 1996 26–26 50.0% #65 1,687 0 2 1991 0–1 0.0% #700 1,495 0 0
20 1997 16–25 39.0% #59 1,632 0 3 1992 0–1 0.0% #333 1,489 0 0
21 1998 22–30 42.3% #66 1,592 0 3 1993 6–8 42.9% #96 1,558 0 0
22 1999 28–26 51.9% #44 1,744 0 4 1994 31–26 54.4% #50 1,751 0 0
23 2000 35–26 57.4% #22 1,824 0 5 1995 34–27 55.7% #30 1,725 0 0
24 2001 36–27 57.1% #26 1,846 0 6 1996 23–24 48.9% #69 1,708 0 0
25 2002 36–27 57.1% #20 1,839 0 7 1997 66–25 72.5% #4 2,006 0 3
26 2003 39–23 62.9% #18 1,826 0 9 1998 34–24 58.6% #24 1,874 0 4
27 2004 17–18 48.6% #57 1,698 0 9 1999 22–23 48.9% #73 1,745 0 4
28 2005 7–10 41.2% #230 1,664 0 9 2000 30–25 54.5% #44 1,778 0 4
29 — — — — — — — 2001 23–24 48.9% #60 1,736 0 4
30 — — — — — — — 2002 21–21 50.0% #48 1,748 0 5
31 — — — — — — — 2003 30–19 61.2% #30 1,838 0 5
32 — — — — — — — 2004 19–24 44.2% #70 1,686 0 5
33 — — — — — — — 2005 19–20 48.7% #62 1,744 0 6
34 — — — — — — — 2006 13–18 41.9% #54 1,677 0 6
35 — — — — — — — 2007 17–19 47.2% #59 1,658 0 6
36 — — — — — — — 2008 7–12 36.8% #172 1,652 0 6