H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC

Sjeng Schalken vs Lars Burgsmuller H2H: 4-2

Sjeng Schalken holds a 4–2 lead over Lars Burgsmuller in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Sjeng Schalken leads 3–1 on hard courts, while Lars Burgsmuller leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Sjeng Schalken won the 2003 US Open second round 4-6 2-6 6-2 6-2 6-0.

NED Age 49 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
4 2
6 main draw meetings
GER Age 50 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 29, 2003* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Sjeng Schalken #12 4-6 2-6 6-2 6-2 6-0 Lars Burgsmuller #85 Match data
Jul 21, 2003 Indianapolis ATP 250 R16 Hard Sjeng Schalken #12 6-4 6-2 Lars Burgsmuller #84 Match data
May 1, 2003* Munich ATP 250 R32 Clay Sjeng Schalken #11 6-3 6-1 Lars Burgsmuller #100 Match data
Aug 30, 2000* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Sjeng Schalken #58 6-1 7-6(5) 6-2 Lars Burgsmuller #203 Match data
Apr 8, 1999* Chennai ATP 250 R32 Hard Lars Burgsmuller #150 4-6 6-3 6-1 Sjeng Schalken #56 Match data
Nov 13, 1998* Moscow ATP 250 R16 Carpet Lars Burgsmuller #141 6-3 5-7 7-5 Sjeng Schalken #68 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sjeng Schalken #677 #11 1,790 1,934 280 254 52.4% 0 0 0 0 9 9
Lars Burgsmuller #1,129 #65 596 1,747 87 149 36.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sjeng Schalken Lars Burgsmuller
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1994 1–2 33.3% #148 1,501 0 0
18 1995 17–14 54.8% #69 1,645 0 1 1994 0–2 0.0% #203 1,475 0 0
19 1996 26–26 50.0% #65 1,687 0 2 1995 1–3 25.0% #162 1,482 0 0
20 1997 16–25 39.0% #59 1,632 0 3 1996 6–6 50.0% #145 1,538 0 0
21 1998 22–30 42.3% #66 1,592 0 3 1997 3–3 50.0% #165 1,544 0 0
22 1999 28–26 51.9% #44 1,744 0 4 1998 7–12 36.8% #134 1,563 0 0
23 2000 35–26 57.4% #22 1,824 0 5 1999 7–8 46.7% #134 1,593 0 0
24 2001 36–27 57.1% #26 1,846 0 6 2000 2–5 28.6% #178 1,608 0 0
25 2002 36–27 57.1% #20 1,839 0 7 2001 14–19 42.4% #83 1,599 0 0
26 2003 39–23 62.9% #18 1,826 0 9 2002 14–21 40.0% #76 1,564 0 1
27 2004 17–18 48.6% #57 1,698 0 9 2003 15–22 40.5% #76 1,615 0 1
28 2005 7–10 41.2% #230 1,664 0 9 2004 8–19 29.6% #100 1,533 0 1
29 2005 6–21 22.2% #141 1,462 0 1
30 2006 4–7 36.4% #177 1,495 0 1
31 2007 0–1 0.0% #426 1,426 0 1