H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Sjeng Schalken vs Lars Burgsmuller H2H: 4-2

Sjeng Schalken holds a 4–2 lead over Lars Burgsmuller in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Sjeng Schalken leads 3–1 on hard courts, while Lars Burgsmuller leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Sjeng Schalken won the 2003 US Open round of 64 4-6 2-6 6-2 6-2 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sjeng Schalken
NED Age 49 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
4 – 2
6 main draw meetings
Lars Burgsmuller
GER Age 50 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sjeng Schalken #12 4-6 2-6 6-2 6-2 6-0 Lars Burgsmuller #85 Match data Aug 29, 2003* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Sjeng Schalken #12 6-4 6-2 Lars Burgsmuller #84 Match data Jul 25, 2003* R16 Indianapolis ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Sjeng Schalken #11 6-3 6-1 Lars Burgsmuller #100 Match data May 1, 2003* R32 Munich Open ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Sjeng Schalken #58 6-1 7-6(5) 6-2 Lars Burgsmuller #203 Match data Aug 30, 2000* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Lars Burgsmuller #150 4-6 6-3 6-1 Sjeng Schalken #56 Match data Apr 8, 1999* R32 Chennai ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Lars Burgsmuller #141 6-3 5-7 7-5 Sjeng Schalken #68 Match data Nov 13, 1998* R16 Moscow ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sjeng Schalken #677 #11 1,790 1,928 280 254 52.4% 0 0 0 1 8 9
Lars Burgsmuller #1,129 #65 596 1,747 87 149 36.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sjeng Schalken Lars Burgsmuller
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1994 1–2 33.3% #148 1,501 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1995 17–14 54.8% #69 1,645 0 1 1994 0–2 0.0% #203 1,475 0 0
19 1996 26–26 50.0% #65 1,687 0 2 1995 1–3 25.0% #162 1,482 0 0
20 1997 16–25 39.0% #59 1,633 0 3 1996 6–6 50.0% #145 1,538 0 0
21 1998 22–30 42.3% #66 1,598 0 3 1997 3–3 50.0% #165 1,543 0 0
22 1999 28–26 51.9% #44 1,744 0 4 1998 7–12 36.8% #134 1,563 0 0
23 2000 35–26 57.4% #22 1,823 0 5 1999 7–8 46.7% #134 1,593 0 0
24 2001 36–27 57.1% #26 1,837 0 6 2000 2–5 28.6% #178 1,611 0 0
25 2002 36–27 57.1% #20 1,839 0 7 2001 14–19 42.4% #83 1,600 0 0
26 2003 39–23 62.9% #18 1,822 0 9 2002 14–21 40.0% #76 1,564 0 1
27 2004 17–18 48.6% #57 1,698 0 9 2003 15–22 40.5% #76 1,614 0 1
28 2005 7–10 41.2% #230 1,663 0 9 2004 8–19 29.6% #100 1,532 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 2005 6–21 22.2% #141 1,463 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 2006 4–7 36.4% #177 1,495 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 2007 0–1 0.0% #426 1,426 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sjeng Schalken Lars Burgsmuller
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1994 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1995 0 2 2 0.0% 14 8 22 63.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1996 10 10 20 50.0% 10 10 20 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1995 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 1997 11 11 22 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1996 2 1 3 66.7% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0%
21 1998 11 15 26 42.3% 5 8 13 38.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1997 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 3 2 5 60.0%
22 1999 17 16 33 51.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1998 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
23 2000 28 17 45 62.2% 4 6 10 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1999 5 6 11 45.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2001 21 15 36 58.3% 8 6 14 57.1% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 2000 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
25 2002 12 16 28 42.9% 5 6 11 45.5% 12 2 14 85.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 2001 8 11 19 42.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
26 2003 23 13 36 63.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 10 2 12 83.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 2002 11 10 21 52.4% 3 8 11 27.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2004 11 12 23 47.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2003 8 13 21 38.1% 4 6 10 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
28 2005 3 6 9 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2004 6 10 16 37.5% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1 7 8 12.5% 1 7 8 12.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 147 133 280 52.5% 61 66 127 48.0% 47 30 77 61.0% 25 25 50 50.0% — 51 79 130 39.2% 17 41 58 29.3% 8 18 26 30.8% 11 11 22 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 466/534 of Sjeng Schalken's and 221/236 of Lars Burgsmuller's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Sjeng Schalken Lars Burgsmuller
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 1994 3/3 3.0 3.7 61.3% 70.8% 53.2% 74.5% 29.2% 64.2% 32.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 1995 29/31 4.6 4.3 60.7% 70.0% 46.7% 57.7% 43.2% 60.7% 38.9% 1994 2/2 3.5 3.0 60.2% 61.6% 48.1% 29.2% 39.7% 56.3% 41.6%
19 1996 44/52 4.6 4.8 56.9% 70.5% 48.1% 62.4% 44.7% 60.7% 36.5% 1995 3/4 5.3 5.3 61.6% 55.0% 42.1% 52.6% 54.3% 50.1% 40.5%
20 1997 33/41 4.2 4.4 58.4% 67.0% 50.3% 56.9% 42.2% 59.7% 35.9% 1996 10/12 3.7 2.7 64.3% 70.9% 51.8% 62.9% 48.1% 64.1% 36.0%
21 1998 41/52 4.3 3.3 59.6% 69.6% 49.3% 59.2% 45.2% 61.2% 37.9% 1997 5/6 3.8 2.0 65.6% 69.2% 53.4% 55.0% 52.0% 63.7% 37.9%
22 1999 46/54 3.5 3.6 62.0% 69.6% 46.4% 53.6% 48.0% 60.6% 40.0% 1998 16/19 3.3 3.6 58.5% 65.8% 47.2% 56.2% 43.9% 58.0% 39.8%
23 2000 53/61 5.3 4.5 56.0% 72.1% 51.2% 57.8% 41.9% 62.7% 38.7% 1999 15/15 3.3 4.0 61.1% 67.1% 49.7% 59.6% 50.2% 60.8% 40.9%
24 2001 53/63 4.0 3.5 60.9% 70.2% 53.1% 54.8% 45.9% 63.4% 40.6% 2000 6/7 2.0 2.3 58.7% 61.3% 48.5% 55.5% 43.3% 56.3% 35.6%
25 2002 52/63 3.1 2.8 66.8% 69.0% 52.9% 53.7% 39.0% 63.6% 38.3% 2001 30/33 3.2 3.8 59.0% 67.3% 49.9% 57.3% 38.9% 60.1% 37.9%
26 2003 60/62 2.7 2.0 67.1% 69.2% 56.7% 56.1% 51.7% 64.7% 40.7% 2002 31/35 3.8 2.9 56.3% 68.9% 48.6% 57.9% 43.3% 59.9% 37.6%
27 2004 35/35 2.6 1.6 73.8% 65.8% 54.7% 55.7% 37.5% 62.8% 36.1% 2003 37/37 5.4 4.0 56.2% 70.1% 49.1% 55.8% 43.2% 61.1% 35.2%
28 2005 17/17 1.5 1.6 71.1% 61.8% 51.4% 55.1% 41.2% 58.8% 38.4% 2004 27/27 3.4 3.4 58.1% 66.1% 45.0% 50.9% 39.5% 57.3% 33.6%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 27/27 4.0 4.3 55.7% 66.8% 43.4% 42.5% 39.9% 56.1% 33.5%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 11/11 4.0 4.0 59.0% 69.6% 48.8% 59.1% 34.6% 61.2% 35.7%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 1/1 1.0 8.0 67.8% 62.7% 42.9% 60.0% 50.0% 56.3% 32.4%
Career — 466/534 3.8 3.4 62.5% 69.2% 51.3% 56.7% 44.1% 62.1% 38.5% — 221/236 3.8 3.6 58.2% 67.6% 47.9% 54.6% 42.4% 59.3% 36.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sjeng Schalken Lars Burgsmuller
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1994 1502 103.3 +0.17 -1.45 0.912 48.2% — — — 42.9% -0.57 0–1 — — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1995 1646 131.2 +0.48 -0.33 0.990 49.8% -114 +64 -77 50.0% -0.04 9–4 (69%) 6–3 (67%) — +0.54 1994 1476 100.4 +0.03 -0.80 0.952 47.8% — — — 20.0% -1.40 0–1 0–1 — +0.16
19 1996 1688 137.5 -0.72 -1.26 0.929 49.0% -25 +3 -110 50.4% -0.08 10–8 (56%) 6–13 (32%) — +0.30 1995 1482 108.0 -1.14 -1.45 0.811 45.7% +53 — — 40.0% -0.60 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.05
20 1997 1634 136.5 -1.45 -0.70 0.889 47.9% +9 +9 -55 43.8% -0.37 5–7 (42%) 8–10 (44%) — -1.14 1996 1538 118.7 +0.81 -1.19 1.003 50.3% +80 -62 — 48.3% +0.24 3–2 (60%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.61
21 1998 1598 132.0 -0.55 +0.75 0.978 50.0% +23 +20 -38 44.9% -0.20 8–13 (38%) 12–11 (52%) — +1.65 1997 1544 106.3 0.00 -0.39 1.043 51.0% +60 — — 46.2% 0.00 1–0 0–3 (0%) — +0.97
22 1999 1745 148.3 -0.52 +2.39 1.015 50.3% -3 -76 -122 51.7% +0.08 8–12 (40%) 9–8 (53%) — -2.44 1998 1563 128.2 -1.56 +1.07 0.949 48.9% +61 — — 40.0% -0.40 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.11
23 2000 1823 145.8 +1.00 +1.26 1.036 50.5% +28 -171 -172 55.8% +0.34 12–9 (57%) 9–6 (60%) — +0.15 1999 1593 121.2 -1.41 +1.27 1.043 50.9% +32 -93 — 45.5% +0.23 5–4 (56%) 1–4 (20%) — +0.63
24 2001 1838 142.0 +0.82 +2.43 1.108 51.7% -14 -117 -151 53.6% +0.32 14–11 (56%) 7–13 (35%) — +1.67 2000 1611 114.4 -1.22 -0.85 0.816 46.0% +27 — — 20.0% -1.67 1–1 0–1 — -0.44
25 2002 1839 143.2 +1.06 +1.20 1.052 50.5% -32 -125 +41 55.2% +0.36 11–7 (61%) 17–18 (49%) — +0.32 2001 1600 125.2 -1.88 -0.37 0.950 48.9% +38 -48 -96 40.7% -0.63 4–3 (57%) 4–5 (44%) — -0.40
26 2003 1822 140.9 +2.08 +3.20 1.152 52.4% -22 -111 +167 61.2% +0.65 6–6 (50%) 13–4 (76%) — +1.00 2002 1564 130.1 -1.79 -0.21 0.940 49.0% +64 -26 — 42.7% -0.26 6–6 (50%) 5–4 (56%) — +0.97
27 2004 1698 129.8 -0.34 -0.21 0.972 49.3% -14 -22 +251 53.7% +0.41 4–3 (57%) 5–5 (50%) — +1.66 2003 1614 116.1 -0.79 -1.83 0.905 48.3% -19 -64 -113 43.0% -0.65 6–8 (43%) 6–4 (60%) — +0.12
28 2005 1664 127.0 -2.29 +0.67 0.930 48.5% +5 +11 — 41.5% -0.51 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) — -1.00 2004 1533 105.7 -4.09 -2.36 0.787 45.7% +15 +1 -76 31.8% -1.27 3–2 (60%) 1–4 (20%) — +1.23
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1463 107.9 -4.62 -2.59 0.763 45.2% -24 +31 +13 26.6% -1.69 3–3 (50%) 4–6 (40%) — +0.70
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1495 109.8 -1.31 -0.91 0.920 48.4% -10 — — 37.9% -0.62 2–2 (50%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.43
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1427 98.9 -3.45 -0.62 0.741 45.8% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.16
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1413 99.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1928 144.9 +0.24 +1.08 1.018 50.3% -6 -38 +4 52.2% +0.15 90–84 (52%) 93–94 (50%) 100.6 +0.52 — 1747 122.3 -2.00 -0.99 0.897 48.0% +28 -32 -62 38.6% -0.67 36–37 (49%) 27–42 (39%) 96.5 +2.11

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.