H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Sjeng Schalken vs Lionel Roux H2H: 1-2

Lionel Roux holds a 2–1 lead over Sjeng Schalken in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Lionel Roux leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Lionel Roux won the 2000 Indianapolis round of 64 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sjeng Schalken
NED Age 49 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Lionel Roux
FRA Age 53 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lionel Roux #194 6-3 6-2 Sjeng Schalken #53 Match data Aug 16, 2000* R64 Indianapolis ATP International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Lionel Roux #75 7-6(3) 6-4 Sjeng Schalken #60 Match data Sep 25, 1997* R32 Toulouse World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Sjeng Schalken #79 6-7(2) 6-4 6-4 Lionel Roux #84 Match data Aug 21, 1997* R32 U.S. Pro Tennis Championships World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sjeng Schalken #677 #11 1,790 1,928 280 254 52.4% 0 0 0 1 8 9
Lionel Roux #975 #48 808 1,727 76 116 39.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sjeng Schalken Lionel Roux
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1994 1–2 33.3% #148 1,501 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1995 17–14 54.8% #69 1,645 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 1996 26–26 50.0% #65 1,687 0 2 1992 2–3 40.0% #192 1,548 0 0
20 1997 16–25 39.0% #59 1,633 0 3 1993 0–4 0.0% #263 1,506 0 0
21 1998 22–30 42.3% #66 1,598 0 3 1994 14–14 50.0% #63 1,656 0 0
22 1999 28–26 51.9% #44 1,744 0 4 1995 16–27 37.2% #96 1,559 0 0
23 2000 35–26 57.4% #22 1,823 0 5 1996 14–19 42.4% #101 1,651 0 0
24 2001 36–27 57.1% #26 1,837 0 6 1997 18–24 42.9% #60 1,689 0 0
25 2002 36–27 57.1% #20 1,839 0 7 1998 5–13 27.8% #255 1,568 0 0
26 2003 39–23 62.9% #18 1,822 0 9 1999 2–4 33.3% #190 1,556 0 0
27 2004 17–18 48.6% #57 1,698 0 9 2000 4–4 50.0% #223 1,582 0 0
28 2005 7–10 41.2% #230 1,663 0 9 2001 0–2 0.0% #559 1,533 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2002 1–2 33.3% #234 1,544 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sjeng Schalken Lionel Roux
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1994 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1995 0 2 2 0.0% 14 8 22 63.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1996 10 10 20 50.0% 10 10 20 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1992 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1997 11 11 22 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1993 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
21 1998 11 15 26 42.3% 5 8 13 38.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1994 8 8 16 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
22 1999 17 16 33 51.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1995 11 14 25 44.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
23 2000 28 17 45 62.2% 4 6 10 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1996 10 11 21 47.6% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2 5 7 28.6%
24 2001 21 15 36 58.3% 8 6 14 57.1% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 1997 13 14 27 48.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 2002 12 16 28 42.9% 5 6 11 45.5% 12 2 14 85.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 1998 4 9 13 30.8% — — — — — — — — 1 4 5 20.0%
26 2003 23 13 36 63.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 10 2 12 83.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 1999 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
27 2004 11 12 23 47.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2000 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2005 3 6 9 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2001 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 147 133 280 52.5% 61 66 127 48.0% 47 30 77 61.0% 25 25 50 50.0% — 53 68 121 43.8% 7 17 24 29.2% 0 6 6 0.0% 16 25 41 39.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 466/534 of Sjeng Schalken's and 157/192 of Lionel Roux's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Sjeng Schalken Lionel Roux
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 1994 3/3 3.0 3.7 61.3% 70.8% 53.2% 74.5% 29.2% 64.2% 32.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 1995 29/31 4.6 4.3 60.7% 70.0% 46.7% 57.7% 43.2% 60.7% 38.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1996 44/52 4.6 4.8 56.9% 70.5% 48.1% 62.4% 44.7% 60.7% 36.5% 1992 3/5 3.0 2.7 55.5% 69.0% 63.2% 20.8% 30.6% 66.7% 40.0%
20 1997 33/41 4.2 4.4 58.4% 67.0% 50.3% 56.9% 42.2% 59.7% 35.9% 1993 4/4 3.8 4.8 52.2% 59.2% 31.1% 29.2% 66.7% 45.7% 29.1%
21 1998 41/52 4.3 3.3 59.6% 69.6% 49.3% 59.2% 45.2% 61.2% 37.9% 1994 23/28 4.4 3.0 54.9% 68.8% 50.5% 61.3% 43.2% 60.7% 36.4%
22 1999 46/54 3.5 3.6 62.0% 69.6% 46.4% 53.6% 48.0% 60.6% 40.0% 1995 34/43 3.3 3.0 56.1% 68.6% 54.4% 63.6% 46.4% 62.3% 34.6%
23 2000 53/61 5.3 4.5 56.0% 72.1% 51.2% 57.8% 41.9% 62.7% 38.7% 1996 30/33 3.9 2.7 56.7% 71.0% 48.2% 53.8% 41.5% 60.9% 36.0%
24 2001 53/63 4.0 3.5 60.9% 70.2% 53.1% 54.8% 45.9% 63.4% 40.6% 1997 36/42 4.2 2.9 57.7% 68.1% 47.0% 51.3% 43.3% 59.0% 36.2%
25 2002 52/63 3.1 2.8 66.8% 69.0% 52.9% 53.7% 39.0% 63.6% 38.3% 1998 15/18 4.7 3.5 56.8% 69.6% 46.3% 62.3% 40.5% 59.6% 33.4%
26 2003 60/62 2.7 2.0 67.1% 69.2% 56.7% 56.1% 51.7% 64.7% 40.7% 1999 2/6 2.5 3.0 52.4% 63.5% 54.3% 62.5% 48.5% 59.1% 42.8%
27 2004 35/35 2.6 1.6 73.8% 65.8% 54.7% 55.7% 37.5% 62.8% 36.1% 2000 6/8 3.0 2.2 57.5% 70.8% 53.4% 50.1% 39.6% 62.5% 39.8%
28 2005 17/17 1.5 1.6 71.1% 61.8% 51.4% 55.1% 41.2% 58.8% 38.4% 2001 2/2 2.0 4.5 52.7% 65.3% 35.4% 41.7% 28.3% 51.4% 35.5%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2002 2/3 3.0 5.0 60.6% 74.4% 52.4% 58.3% 50.0% 65.8% 21.6%
Career — 466/534 3.8 3.4 62.5% 69.2% 51.3% 56.7% 44.1% 62.1% 38.5% — 157/192 3.9 3.0 56.4% 68.9% 49.4% 55.9% 43.5% 60.3% 35.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sjeng Schalken Lionel Roux
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1994 1502 103.3 +0.17 -1.45 0.912 48.2% — — — 42.9% -0.57 0–1 — — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1995 1646 131.2 +0.48 -0.33 0.990 49.8% -114 +64 -77 50.0% -0.04 9–4 (69%) 6–3 (67%) — +0.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1996 1688 137.5 -0.72 -1.26 0.929 49.0% -25 +3 -110 50.4% -0.08 10–8 (56%) 6–13 (32%) — +0.30 1992 1548 131.1 +0.92 +0.58 1.202 52.0% +14 — — 40.0% -0.33 1–1 1–1 — -0.69
20 1997 1634 136.5 -1.45 -0.70 0.889 47.9% +9 +9 -55 43.8% -0.37 5–7 (42%) 8–10 (44%) — -1.14 1993 1507 96.5 -3.31 -2.76 0.536 38.1% +13 — — 10.0% -3.20 — — — -0.08
21 1998 1598 132.0 -0.55 +0.75 0.978 50.0% +23 +20 -38 44.9% -0.20 8–13 (38%) 12–11 (52%) — +1.65 1994 1657 139.6 -0.98 -0.71 0.928 49.0% +13 — — 52.4% +0.36 3–4 (43%) 6–6 (50%) — +0.42
22 1999 1745 148.3 -0.52 +2.39 1.015 50.3% -3 -76 -122 51.7% +0.08 8–12 (40%) 9–8 (53%) — -2.44 1995 1559 127.6 +0.67 -2.83 0.918 49.0% +40 -46 — 41.3% -0.49 3–9 (25%) 5–7 (42%) — +0.01
23 2000 1823 145.8 +1.00 +1.26 1.036 50.5% +28 -171 -172 55.8% +0.34 12–9 (57%) 9–6 (60%) — +0.15 1996 1651 134.0 -0.24 -0.63 0.922 48.5% +12 -132 — 44.3% -0.35 8–9 (47%) 7–10 (41%) — -0.05
24 2001 1838 142.0 +0.82 +2.43 1.108 51.7% -14 -117 -151 53.6% +0.32 14–11 (56%) 7–13 (35%) — +1.67 1997 1690 136.1 -1.99 -0.80 0.883 47.9% +17 -125 -164 43.6% -0.48 7–6 (54%) 9–8 (53%) — -1.26
25 2002 1839 143.2 +1.06 +1.20 1.052 50.5% -32 -125 +41 55.2% +0.36 11–7 (61%) 17–18 (49%) — +0.32 1998 1569 114.5 -0.91 -3.18 0.827 47.1% +6 — — 40.0% -0.78 1–6 (14%) 3–4 (43%) — +1.15
26 2003 1822 140.9 +2.08 +3.20 1.152 52.4% -22 -111 +167 61.2% +0.65 6–6 (50%) 13–4 (76%) — +1.00 1999 1557 108.6 +0.65 +1.25 1.047 50.7% +21 — — 38.5% -1.00 1–0 1–1 — +0.24
27 2004 1698 129.8 -0.34 -0.21 0.972 49.3% -14 -22 +251 53.7% +0.41 4–3 (57%) 5–5 (50%) — +1.66 2000 1582 117.3 +0.22 +1.83 1.062 51.1% +21 — — 43.8% -0.75 1–1 1–1 — -0.08
28 2005 1664 127.0 -2.29 +0.67 0.930 48.5% +5 +11 — 41.5% -0.51 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) — -1.00 2001 1534 99.8 -4.68 +1.86 0.730 43.3% — — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 — — -0.03
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1544 109.5 -3.49 +0.65 0.631 44.1% +31 — — 28.6% -1.29 1–0 0–1 — -0.32
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1529 98.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1928 144.9 +0.24 +1.08 1.018 50.3% -6 -38 +4 52.2% +0.15 90–84 (52%) 93–94 (50%) 100.6 +0.52 — 1728 134.6 -0.74 -1.27 0.895 48.2% +20 -96 -164 42.6% -0.49 26–37 (41%) 33–39 (46%) 98.9 -0.36

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.