H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Sjeng Schalken vs Magnus Gustafsson H2H: 1-1

Sjeng Schalken and Magnus Gustafsson are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Magnus Gustafsson won the 1997 Amsterdam third round 6-3 6-3.

NED Age 49 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1 1
2 main draw meetings
SWE Age 59 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 31, 1997* Amsterdam ATP 250 R32 Clay Magnus Gustafsson #60 6-3 6-3 Sjeng Schalken #85 Match data
Sep 29, 1995* Palermo ATP 250 R16 Clay Sjeng Schalken #77 6-4 6-3 Magnus Gustafsson #105 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sjeng Schalken #677 #11 1,790 1,934 280 254 52.4% 0 0 0 0 9 9
Magnus Gustafsson #681 #10 2,141 2,012 394 252 61.0% 0 0 0 0 14 14

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sjeng Schalken Magnus Gustafsson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1994 1–2 33.3% #148 1,501 0 0
18 1995 17–14 54.8% #69 1,645 0 1
19 1996 26–26 50.0% #65 1,687 0 2 1986 0–2 0.0% #273 1,479 0 0
20 1997 16–25 39.0% #59 1,632 0 3 1987 5–4 55.6% #53 1,586 0 0
21 1998 22–30 42.3% #66 1,592 0 3 1988 24–19 55.8% #51 1,710 0 0
22 1999 28–26 51.9% #44 1,744 0 4 1989 23–18 56.1% #34 1,804 0 0
23 2000 35–26 57.4% #22 1,824 0 5 1990 25–16 61.0% #31 1,825 0 0
24 2001 36–27 57.1% #26 1,846 0 6 1991 47–17 73.4% #12 1,947 0 3
25 2002 36–27 57.1% #20 1,839 0 7 1992 26–20 56.5% #47 1,787 0 4
26 2003 39–23 62.9% #18 1,826 0 9 1993 50–29 63.3% #14 1,891 0 5
27 2004 17–18 48.6% #57 1,698 0 9 1994 26–11 70.3% #33 1,857 0 7
28 2005 7–10 41.2% #230 1,664 0 9 1995 11–11 50.0% #84 1,732 0 7
29 1996 36–16 69.2% #17 1,899 0 9
30 1997 26–18 59.1% #37 1,830 0 10
31 1998 37–21 63.8% #32 1,874 0 12
32 1999 22–18 55.0% #60 1,802 0 13
33 2000 17–14 54.8% #82 1,718 0 14
34 2001 19–18 51.4% #82 1,695 0 14