H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Sjeng Schalken vs Marc Rosset H2H: 2-0
Sjeng Schalken holds a 2–0 lead over Marc Rosset in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sjeng Schalken leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sjeng Schalken won the 2002 Moscow third round 3-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 49
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 55
Right-Handed
201 cm / 6'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2002* | Moscow | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Sjeng Schalken | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | Marc Rosset | Match data |
| May 6, 1998* | Hamburg Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Sjeng Schalken | 6-2 1-0 (ret.) | Marc Rosset | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sjeng Schalken | #677 | #11 | 1,790 | 1,934 | 280 | 254 | 52.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Marc Rosset | #1,490 | #9 | 2,069 | 1,950 | 398 | 334 | 54.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 14 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sjeng Schalken | Marc Rosset | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #474 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1995 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #69 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 7–2 | 77.8% | #45 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1996 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #22 | 1,811 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1997 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #59 | 1,632 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 18–28 | 39.1% | #60 | 1,648 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1998 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #66 | 1,592 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #35 | 1,826 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1999 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #44 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #16 | 1,922 | 0 | 6 |
| 23 | 2000 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #22 | 1,824 | 0 | 5 | 1994 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #14 | 1,925 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 2001 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #26 | 1,846 | 0 | 6 | 1995 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #15 | 1,814 | 0 | 10 |
| 25 | 2002 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #20 | 1,839 | 0 | 7 | 1996 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #22 | 1,771 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 2003 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #18 | 1,826 | 0 | 9 | 1997 | 32–31 | 50.8% | #31 | 1,630 | 0 | 11 |
| 27 | 2004 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #57 | 1,698 | 0 | 9 | 1998 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,749 | 0 | 11 |
| 28 | 2005 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #230 | 1,664 | 0 | 9 | 1999 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #45 | 1,658 | 0 | 12 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #28 | 1,723 | 0 | 14 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #119 | 1,601 | 0 | 14 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,597 | 0 | 14 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #122 | 1,586 | 0 | 14 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #214 | 1,546 | 0 | 14 |