H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 01:16 UTC
Sjeng Schalken vs Mariano Zabaleta H2H: 0-1
Mariano Zabaleta holds a 1–0 lead over Sjeng Schalken in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mariano Zabaleta leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mariano Zabaleta won the 2003 Canada Masters second round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 49
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 48
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 6, 2003* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Mariano Zabaleta | 6-1 6-1 | Sjeng Schalken | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sjeng Schalken | #677 | #11 | 1,790 | 1,934 | 280 | 254 | 52.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Mariano Zabaleta | #1,009 | #21 | 1,426 | 1,878 | 199 | 206 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sjeng Schalken | Mariano Zabaleta | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #381 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1995 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #69 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #103 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1996 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #257 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #59 | 1,632 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #63 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1998 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #66 | 1,592 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 28–29 | 49.1% | #28 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1999 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #44 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 | 2000 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #61 | 1,635 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2000 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #22 | 1,824 | 0 | 5 | 2001 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,723 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2001 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #26 | 1,846 | 0 | 6 | 2002 | 20–28 | 41.7% | #53 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2002 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #20 | 1,839 | 0 | 7 | 2003 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #27 | 1,763 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2003 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #18 | 1,826 | 0 | 9 | 2004 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #54 | 1,708 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2004 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #57 | 1,698 | 0 | 9 | 2005 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #83 | 1,726 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2005 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #230 | 1,664 | 0 | 9 | 2006 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #243 | 1,596 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #104 | 1,602 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1141 | 1,556 | 0 | 3 |