H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Sjeng Schalken vs Mark Philippoussis H2H: 3-5

Mark Philippoussis holds a 5–3 lead over Sjeng Schalken in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Mark Philippoussis leads 4–3 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Sjeng Schalken won the 2002 US Open first round 6-7(1) 4-6 6-3 6-3.

NED Age 49 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
3 5
8 main draw meetings
AUS Age 49 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 28, 2002* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Sjeng Schalken #25 6-7(1) 4-6 6-3 6-3 Mark Philippoussis #70 Match data
Jan 4, 2002* Adelaide ATP 250 R16 Hard Mark Philippoussis #104 6-0 6-3 Sjeng Schalken #26 Match data
Oct 14, 2000* Tokyo ATP 250 QF Hard Sjeng Schalken #51 6-2 6-3 Mark Philippoussis #14 Match data
Jul 2, 2000* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Mark Philippoussis #18 4-6 6-3 6-7(7) 7-6(4) 20-18 Sjeng Schalken #53 Match data
Mar 19, 2000* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard Mark Philippoussis #35 7-6(7) 6-4 Sjeng Schalken #64 Match data
Feb 20, 1998* Memphis ATP 250 R16 Hard Mark Philippoussis #16 6-4 6-4 Sjeng Schalken #57 Match data
Aug 6, 1997* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Sjeng Schalken #85 7-6(5) 6-3 Mark Philippoussis #13 Match data
Aug 21, 1996* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Mark Philippoussis #29 6-3 6-4 Sjeng Schalken #49 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sjeng Schalken #677 #11 1,790 1,934 280 254 52.4% 0 0 0 0 9 9
Mark Philippoussis #1,115 #8 2,296 2,022 287 190 60.2% 0 1 0 0 10 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sjeng Schalken Mark Philippoussis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1994 1–2 33.3% #148 1,501 0 0 1994 1–3 25.0% #274 1,492 0 0
18 1995 17–14 54.8% #69 1,645 0 1 1995 25–17 59.5% #38 1,764 0 0
19 1996 26–26 50.0% #65 1,687 0 2 1996 31–22 58.5% #30 1,838 0 1
20 1997 16–25 39.0% #59 1,632 0 3 1997 43–18 70.5% #18 1,852 0 4
21 1998 22–30 42.3% #66 1,592 0 3 1998 31–19 62.0% #15 1,906 0 5
22 1999 28–26 51.9% #44 1,744 0 4 1999 30–15 66.7% #19 1,892 0 7
23 2000 35–26 57.4% #22 1,824 0 5 2000 40–21 65.6% #11 1,894 0 8
24 2001 36–27 57.1% #26 1,846 0 6 2001 10–8 55.6% #104 1,803 0 9
25 2002 36–27 57.1% #20 1,839 0 7 2002 14–14 50.0% #80 1,772 0 9
26 2003 39–23 62.9% #18 1,826 0 9 2003 34–18 65.4% #9 1,881 0 10
27 2004 17–18 48.6% #57 1,698 0 9 2004 8–15 34.8% #109 1,669 0 10
28 2005 7–10 41.2% #230 1,664 0 9 2005 9–11 45.0% #171 1,659 0 10
29 2006 11–9 55.0% #114 1,732 0 11