H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC
Sjeng Schalken vs Mats Wilander H2H: 1-0
Sjeng Schalken holds a 1–0 lead over Mats Wilander in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sjeng Schalken leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Sjeng Schalken won the 1996 Singapore third round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 49
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 61
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 1996* | Singapore | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Sjeng Schalken | 6-2 6-2 | Mats Wilander | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sjeng Schalken | #677 | #11 | 1,790 | 1,934 | 280 | 254 | 52.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Mats Wilander | #1,354 | #1 | 1,075 | 2,262 | 526 | 203 | 72.2% | 7 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 33 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sjeng Schalken | Mats Wilander | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #283 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #73 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 56–16 | 77.8% | #8 | 2,020 | 1 | 4 |
| 18 | 1995 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #69 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 71–11 | 86.6% | #4 | 2,246 | 2 | 13 |
| 19 | 1996 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 49–12 | 80.3% | #4 | 2,177 | 3 | 16 |
| 20 | 1997 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #59 | 1,632 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 65–17 | 79.3% | #3 | 2,108 | 4 | 19 |
| 21 | 1998 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #66 | 1,592 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 46–13 | 78.0% | #3 | 2,056 | 4 | 21 |
| 22 | 1999 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #44 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 | 1987 | 65–17 | 79.3% | #3 | 2,082 | 4 | 26 |
| 23 | 2000 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #22 | 1,824 | 0 | 5 | 1988 | 51–9 | 85.0% | #1 | 2,152 | 7 | 32 |
| 24 | 2001 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #26 | 1,846 | 0 | 6 | 1989 | 31–15 | 67.4% | #12 | 1,922 | 7 | 32 |
| 25 | 2002 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #20 | 1,839 | 0 | 7 | 1990 | 21–13 | 61.8% | #41 | 1,894 | 7 | 33 |
| 26 | 2003 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #18 | 1,826 | 0 | 9 | 1991 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #159 | 1,767 | 7 | 33 |
| 27 | 2004 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #57 | 1,698 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2005 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #230 | 1,664 | 0 | 9 | 1993 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #330 | 1,695 | 7 | 33 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #129 | 1,652 | 7 | 33 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #46 | 1,766 | 7 | 33 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #196 | 1,679 | 7 | 33 |