H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Sjeng Schalken vs Max Mirnyi H2H: 0-1
Max Mirnyi holds a 1–0 lead over Sjeng Schalken in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Max Mirnyi leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Max Mirnyi won the 2001 Los Angeles third round 6-3 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 49
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
BLR
Age 49
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 2001* | Los Angeles | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Max Mirnyi | 6-3 7-6(3) | Sjeng Schalken | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sjeng Schalken | #677 | #11 | 1,790 | 1,934 | 280 | 254 | 52.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Max Mirnyi | #1,155 | #18 | 1,320 | 1,913 | 216 | 222 | 49.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sjeng Schalken | Max Mirnyi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #69 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #314 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1996 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #340 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #59 | 1,632 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #274 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #66 | 1,592 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #74 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #44 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 | 2000 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #40 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #22 | 1,824 | 0 | 5 | 2001 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #35 | 1,865 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #26 | 1,846 | 0 | 6 | 2002 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #43 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #20 | 1,839 | 0 | 7 | 2003 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #23 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2003 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #18 | 1,826 | 0 | 9 | 2004 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #47 | 1,719 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2004 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #57 | 1,698 | 0 | 9 | 2005 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #34 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2005 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #230 | 1,664 | 0 | 9 | 2006 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #59 | 1,723 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #152 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #523 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 |