H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Sjeng Schalken vs Mikhail Youzhny H2H: 1-0

Sjeng Schalken holds a 1–0 lead over Mikhail Youzhny in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sjeng Schalken leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sjeng Schalken won the 2003 Dubai third round 7-5 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sjeng Schalken
NED Age 49 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Mikhail Youzhny
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 27, 2003* Dubai ATP 250 R32 Hard Sjeng Schalken #15 7-5 6-0 Mikhail Youzhny #27 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sjeng Schalken #677 #11 1,790 1,934 280 254 52.4% 0 0 0 0 9 9
Mikhail Youzhny #115 #8 3,500 2,069 477 405 54.1% 0 0 0 1 9 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sjeng Schalken Mikhail Youzhny
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1994 1–2 33.3% #148 1,501 0 0 1999 0–1 0.0% #286 1,493 0 0
18 1995 17–14 54.8% #69 1,645 0 1 2000 5–8 38.5% #113 1,531 0 0
19 1996 26–26 50.0% #65 1,687 0 2 2001 20–18 52.6% #58 1,694 0 0
20 1997 16–25 39.0% #59 1,632 0 3 2002 30–22 57.7% #32 1,866 0 1
21 1998 22–30 42.3% #66 1,592 0 3 2003 28–26 51.9% #43 1,746 0 1
22 1999 28–26 51.9% #44 1,744 0 4 2004 38–25 60.3% #16 1,870 0 2
23 2000 35–26 57.4% #22 1,824 0 5 2005 23–21 52.3% #43 1,758 0 2
24 2001 36–27 57.1% #26 1,846 0 6 2006 23–22 51.1% #24 1,803 0 2
25 2002 36–27 57.1% #20 1,839 0 7 2007 48–24 66.7% #19 1,880 0 3
26 2003 39–23 62.9% #18 1,826 0 9 2008 24–19 55.8% #32 1,761 0 4
27 2004 17–18 48.6% #57 1,698 0 9 2009 41–27 60.3% #19 1,960 0 5
28 2005 7–10 41.2% #230 1,664 0 9 2010 40–19 67.8% #10 1,936 0 7
29 — — — — — — — 2011 24–22 52.2% #35 1,837 0 7
30 — — — — — — — 2012 33–21 61.1% #25 1,902 0 8
31 — — — — — — — 2013 39–24 61.9% #15 2,016 0 10
32 — — — — — — — 2014 18–24 42.9% #48 1,795 0 10
33 — — — — — — — 2015 9–24 27.3% #127 1,701 0 10
34 — — — — — — — 2016 17–20 45.9% #57 1,774 0 10
35 — — — — — — — 2017 10–20 33.3% #84 1,679 0 10
36 — — — — — — — 2018 7–18 28.0% #115 1,637 0 10