H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Sjeng Schalken vs Nicolas Escude H2H: 1-3
Nicolas Escude holds a 3–1 lead over Sjeng Schalken in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Nicolas Escude leads 3–0 on hard courts, while Sjeng Schalken leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Nicolas Escude won the 2004 Indian Wells Masters second round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 49
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 50
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2004* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Nicolas Escude | 6-3 6-2 | Sjeng Schalken | Match data |
| Oct 5, 2002* | Moscow | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Sjeng Schalken | 6-4 6-7(4) 6-3 | Nicolas Escude | Match data |
| Mar 13, 2002* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Nicolas Escude | 6-3 6-0 | Sjeng Schalken | Match data |
| Sep 18, 1998* | Tashkent | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Nicolas Escude | 6-4 7-6(7) | Sjeng Schalken | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sjeng Schalken | #677 | #11 | 1,790 | 1,934 | 280 | 254 | 52.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Nicolas Escude | #1,071 | #17 | 1,357 | 1,909 | 157 | 124 | 55.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sjeng Schalken | Nicolas Escude | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #670 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1995 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #69 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #189 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #59 | 1,632 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1998 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #66 | 1,592 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #44 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 | 1998 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #22 | 1,824 | 0 | 5 | 1999 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #37 | 1,820 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2001 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #26 | 1,846 | 0 | 6 | 2000 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #48 | 1,717 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2002 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #20 | 1,839 | 0 | 7 | 2001 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #27 | 1,724 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2003 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #18 | 1,826 | 0 | 9 | 2002 | 29–15 | 65.9% | #34 | 1,842 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2004 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #57 | 1,698 | 0 | 9 | 2003 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #114 | 1,790 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2005 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #230 | 1,664 | 0 | 9 | 2004 | 15–8 | 65.2% | #64 | 1,829 | 0 | 4 |