H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Sjeng Schalken vs Nicolas Kiefer H2H: 0-4

Nicolas Kiefer holds a 4–0 lead over Sjeng Schalken in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Nicolas Kiefer leads 4–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicolas Kiefer won the 2005 Adelaide third round 6-2 4-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sjeng Schalken
NED Age 49 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0 – 4
4 main draw meetings
Nicolas Kiefer
GER Age 49 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 6, 2005* Adelaide ATP 250 R32 Hard Nicolas Kiefer #21 6-2 4-6 6-3 Sjeng Schalken #57 Match data
Aug 1, 2003* Los Angeles ATP 250 R16 Hard Nicolas Kiefer #75 6-4 6-4 Sjeng Schalken #12 Match data
Sep 3, 2000* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Nicolas Kiefer #14 7-5 6-3 6-4 Sjeng Schalken #58 Match data
Jan 8, 2000* Doha ATP 250 QF Hard Nicolas Kiefer #6 6-1 6-0 Sjeng Schalken #44 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sjeng Schalken #677 #11 1,790 1,934 280 254 52.4% 0 0 0 0 9 9
Nicolas Kiefer #720 #4 2,447 1,984 343 252 57.6% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sjeng Schalken Nicolas Kiefer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1994 0–1 0.0% #1198 1,489 0 0
17 1994 1–2 33.3% #148 1,501 0 0 1995 3–3 50.0% #206 1,527 0 0
18 1995 17–14 54.8% #69 1,645 0 1 1996 7–9 43.8% #128 1,562 0 0
19 1996 26–26 50.0% #65 1,687 0 2 1997 26–16 61.9% #32 1,798 0 1
20 1997 16–25 39.0% #59 1,632 0 3 1998 31–25 55.4% #35 1,790 0 1
21 1998 22–30 42.3% #66 1,592 0 3 1999 53–21 71.6% #6 1,921 0 4
22 1999 28–26 51.9% #44 1,744 0 4 2000 30–15 66.7% #20 1,921 0 6
23 2000 35–26 57.4% #22 1,824 0 5 2001 26–25 51.0% #42 1,766 0 6
24 2001 36–27 57.1% #26 1,846 0 6 2002 19–24 44.2% #72 1,718 0 6
25 2002 36–27 57.1% #20 1,839 0 7 2003 19–17 52.8% #58 1,727 0 6
26 2003 39–23 62.9% #18 1,826 0 9 2004 32–19 62.7% #21 1,897 0 6
27 2004 17–18 48.6% #57 1,698 0 9 2005 31–22 58.5% #22 1,854 0 6
28 2005 7–10 41.2% #230 1,664 0 9 2006 14–8 63.6% #48 1,843 0 6
29 — — — — — — — 2007 19–12 61.3% #49 1,893 0 6
30 — — — — — — — 2008 20–16 55.6% #38 1,876 0 6
31 — — — — — — — 2009 12–16 42.9% #116 1,757 0 6
32 — — — — — — — 2010 1–3 25.0% #722 1,717 0 6