H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Sjeng Schalken vs Nicolas Lapentti H2H: 6-1

Sjeng Schalken holds a 6–1 lead over Nicolas Lapentti in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Sjeng Schalken leads 4–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sjeng Schalken won the 2003 Wimbledon second round 6-2 3-6 6-7(3) 7-6(4) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sjeng Schalken
NED Age 49 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
6 – 1
7 main draw meetings
Nicolas Lapentti
ECU Age 49 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 27, 2003* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Sjeng Schalken #12 6-2 3-6 6-7(3) 7-6(4) 6-3 Nicolas Lapentti #47 Match data
May 3, 2001* Munich ATP 250 R32 Clay Sjeng Schalken #29 6-7(6) 6-3 6-4 Nicolas Lapentti #40 Match data
Oct 21, 2000* Shanghai ATP 250 QF Hard Sjeng Schalken #34 6-3 6-4 Nicolas Lapentti #15 Match data
Oct 15, 2000* Tokyo ATP 250 F Hard Sjeng Schalken #51 6-4 3-6 6-1 Nicolas Lapentti #16 Match data
Aug 13, 1997* New Haven ATP 250 R64 Hard Nicolas Lapentti #94 6-1 (ret.) Sjeng Schalken #82 Match data
Mar 13, 1996* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Sjeng Schalken #53 7-6(4) 6-3 Nicolas Lapentti #98 Match data
Jan 12, 1996* Jakarta ATP 250 R16 Hard Sjeng Schalken #69 6-3 4-6 6-1 Nicolas Lapentti #110 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sjeng Schalken #677 #11 1,790 1,934 280 254 52.4% 0 0 0 0 9 9
Nicolas Lapentti #885 #6 2,293 1,935 282 280 50.2% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sjeng Schalken Nicolas Lapentti
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1994 1–2 33.3% #148 1,501 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1995 17–14 54.8% #69 1,645 0 1 1995 5–0 100.0% #109 1,594 0 1
19 1996 26–26 50.0% #65 1,687 0 2 1996 11–19 36.7% #121 1,576 0 1
20 1997 16–25 39.0% #59 1,632 0 3 1997 17–18 48.6% #63 1,660 0 1
21 1998 22–30 42.3% #66 1,592 0 3 1998 16–29 35.6% #90 1,596 0 1
22 1999 28–26 51.9% #44 1,744 0 4 1999 52–24 68.4% #8 1,883 0 3
23 2000 35–26 57.4% #22 1,824 0 5 2000 40–28 58.8% #24 1,755 0 3
24 2001 36–27 57.1% #26 1,846 0 6 2001 30–22 57.7% #23 1,837 0 4
25 2002 36–27 57.1% #20 1,839 0 7 2002 32–27 54.2% #29 1,714 0 5
26 2003 39–23 62.9% #18 1,826 0 9 2003 20–22 47.6% #57 1,697 0 5
27 2004 17–18 48.6% #57 1,698 0 9 2004 7–14 33.3% #122 1,600 0 5
28 2005 7–10 41.2% #230 1,664 0 9 2005 9–16 36.0% #95 1,579 0 5
29 — — — — — — — 2006 12–9 57.1% #67 1,682 0 5
30 — — — — — — — 2007 10–14 41.7% #109 1,611 0 5
31 — — — — — — — 2008 14–17 45.2% #86 1,658 0 5
32 — — — — — — — 2009 6–14 30.0% #97 1,668 0 5
33 — — — — — — — 2010 1–7 12.5% #447 1,582 0 5