H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Sjeng Schalken vs Nikolay Davydenko H2H: 2-2
Sjeng Schalken and Nikolay Davydenko are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Nikolay Davydenko leads 2–0 on clay, while Sjeng Schalken leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nikolay Davydenko won the 2005 St. Poelten fourth round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 49
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 45
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2005* | St. Poelten | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Nikolay Davydenko | 6-3 6-1 | Sjeng Schalken | Match data |
| Feb 10, 2005* | Marseille | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Sjeng Schalken | 3-6 6-4 6-1 | Nikolay Davydenko | Match data |
| Apr 10, 2003* | Estoril | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Nikolay Davydenko | 6-3 6-2 | Sjeng Schalken | Match data |
| Aug 16, 2001* | Washington | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Sjeng Schalken | 6-3 6-1 | Nikolay Davydenko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sjeng Schalken | #677 | #11 | 1,790 | 1,934 | 280 | 254 | 52.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Nikolay Davydenko | #248 | #3 | 5,335 | 2,213 | 467 | 324 | 59.0% | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 21 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sjeng Schalken | Nikolay Davydenko | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #69 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #133 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #59 | 1,632 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #79 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #66 | 1,592 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 12–24 | 33.3% | #81 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #44 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 | 2003 | 29–30 | 49.2% | #44 | 1,595 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2000 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #22 | 1,824 | 0 | 5 | 2004 | 32–28 | 53.3% | #28 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 2001 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #26 | 1,846 | 0 | 6 | 2005 | 52–29 | 64.2% | #5 | 1,868 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 2002 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #20 | 1,839 | 0 | 7 | 2006 | 67–28 | 70.5% | #3 | 1,971 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 2003 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #18 | 1,826 | 0 | 9 | 2007 | 53–30 | 63.9% | #4 | 1,935 | 0 | 11 |
| 27 | 2004 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #57 | 1,698 | 0 | 9 | 2008 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #5 | 1,974 | 0 | 14 |
| 28 | 2005 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #230 | 1,664 | 0 | 9 | 2009 | 57–19 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,142 | 0 | 19 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #22 | 1,897 | 0 | 20 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #41 | 1,848 | 0 | 21 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #44 | 1,824 | 0 | 21 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,824 | 0 | 21 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #250 | 1,730 | 0 | 21 |