H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Sjeng Schalken vs Paradorn Srichaphan H2H: 1-2
Paradorn Srichaphan holds a 2–1 lead over Sjeng Schalken in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Paradorn Srichaphan leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Paradorn Srichaphan won the 2004 Cincinnati Masters third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 49
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
THA
Age 47
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 2004* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Paradorn Srichaphan | 6-3 6-4 | Sjeng Schalken | Match data |
| Aug 16, 2002* | Washington | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Paradorn Srichaphan | 4-6 6-2 6-4 | Sjeng Schalken | Match data |
| Oct 11, 2000* | Tokyo | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Sjeng Schalken | 7-5 5-7 6-2 | Paradorn Srichaphan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sjeng Schalken | #677 | #11 | 1,790 | 1,934 | 280 | 254 | 52.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Paradorn Srichaphan | #1,149 | #9 | 1,925 | 1,997 | 219 | 182 | 54.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sjeng Schalken | Paradorn Srichaphan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #69 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #460 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1996 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1997 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #59 | 1,632 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #99 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #66 | 1,592 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #44 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 | 2001 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #120 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #22 | 1,824 | 0 | 5 | 2002 | 46–23 | 66.7% | #16 | 1,962 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2001 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #26 | 1,846 | 0 | 6 | 2003 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #11 | 1,823 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2002 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #20 | 1,839 | 0 | 7 | 2004 | 42–28 | 60.0% | #27 | 1,774 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2003 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #18 | 1,826 | 0 | 9 | 2005 | 31–29 | 51.7% | #42 | 1,794 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2004 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #57 | 1,698 | 0 | 9 | 2006 | 28–31 | 47.5% | #53 | 1,744 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2005 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #230 | 1,664 | 0 | 9 | 2007 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #628 | 1,636 | 0 | 5 |