H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Sjeng Schalken vs Patrick Rafter H2H: 1-3

Patrick Rafter holds a 3–1 lead over Sjeng Schalken in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Patrick Rafter leads 3–0 on grass, while Sjeng Schalken leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Patrick Rafter won the 2000 S Hertogenbosch fourth round 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sjeng Schalken
NED Age 49 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main draw meetings
Patrick Rafter
AUS Age 53 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 23, 2000* S Hertogenbosch ATP 250 R16 Grass Patrick Rafter #27 6-3 6-2 Sjeng Schalken #52 Match data
Jun 15, 2000* Halle ATP 250 R32 Grass Patrick Rafter #23 7-6(5) 7-6(4) Sjeng Schalken #50 Match data
Jun 20, 1998* S Hertogenbosch ATP 250 QF Grass Patrick Rafter #6 6-1 6-4 Sjeng Schalken #55 Match data
May 13, 1998* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Sjeng Schalken #57 6-3 6-7(4) 6-4 Patrick Rafter #4 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sjeng Schalken #677 #11 1,790 1,934 280 254 52.4% 0 0 0 0 9 9
Patrick Rafter #224 #1 3,673 2,104 332 177 65.2% 2 2 0 0 7 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sjeng Schalken Patrick Rafter
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1994 1–2 33.3% #148 1,501 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1995 17–14 54.8% #69 1,645 0 1 1991 0–1 0.0% #293 1,495 0 0
19 1996 26–26 50.0% #65 1,687 0 2 1992 0–3 0.0% #243 1,456 0 0
20 1997 16–25 39.0% #59 1,632 0 3 1993 11–11 50.0% #66 1,619 0 0
21 1998 22–30 42.3% #66 1,592 0 3 1994 43–26 62.3% #20 1,803 0 1
22 1999 28–26 51.9% #44 1,744 0 4 1995 29–23 55.8% #66 1,777 0 1
23 2000 35–26 57.4% #22 1,824 0 5 1996 25–20 55.6% #62 1,761 0 1
24 2001 36–27 57.1% #26 1,846 0 6 1997 63–26 70.8% #2 2,035 1 2
25 2002 36–27 57.1% #20 1,839 0 7 1998 58–20 74.4% #4 2,010 2 8
26 2003 39–23 62.9% #18 1,826 0 9 1999 31–16 66.0% #16 1,933 2 9
27 2004 17–18 48.6% #57 1,698 0 9 2000 30–16 65.2% #15 1,889 2 10
28 2005 7–10 41.2% #230 1,664 0 9 2001 42–15 73.7% #7 1,989 2 11