H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Sjeng Schalken vs Patrik Kuhnen H2H: 1-0
Sjeng Schalken holds a 1–0 lead over Patrik Kuhnen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sjeng Schalken leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Sjeng Schalken won the 1996 Beijing fourth round 6-4 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 49
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 60
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 1996* | Beijing | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Sjeng Schalken | 6-4 7-6(4) | Patrik Kuhnen | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sjeng Schalken | #677 | #11 | 1,790 | 1,934 | 280 | 254 | 52.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Patrik Kuhnen | #1,341 | #43 | 574 | 1,787 | 126 | 151 | 45.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sjeng Schalken | Patrik Kuhnen | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #69 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1997 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #59 | 1,632 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #170 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #66 | 1,592 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #83 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #44 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 | 1988 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #61 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #22 | 1,824 | 0 | 5 | 1989 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #69 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #26 | 1,846 | 0 | 6 | 1990 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #82 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #20 | 1,839 | 0 | 7 | 1991 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #86 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2003 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #18 | 1,826 | 0 | 9 | 1992 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #89 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2004 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #57 | 1,698 | 0 | 9 | 1993 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #119 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2005 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #230 | 1,664 | 0 | 9 | 1994 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #189 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #187 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #504 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |