H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Sjeng Schalken vs Paul Haarhuis H2H: 2-1
Sjeng Schalken holds a 2–1 lead over Paul Haarhuis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Sjeng Schalken leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sjeng Schalken won the 1999 Boston third round 4-6 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 49
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
NED
Age 60
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 1999* | Boston | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Sjeng Schalken | 4-6 6-3 6-0 | Paul Haarhuis | Match data |
| May 26, 1999* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Sjeng Schalken | 6-2 6-3 4-6 6-3 | Paul Haarhuis | Match data |
| Aug 29, 1998* | Boston | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Paul Haarhuis | 0-6 6-4 6-3 | Sjeng Schalken | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sjeng Schalken | #677 | #11 | 1,790 | 1,934 | 280 | 254 | 52.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Paul Haarhuis | #623 | #18 | 1,341 | 1,885 | 250 | 245 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sjeng Schalken | Paul Haarhuis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #69 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1997 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #59 | 1,632 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1998 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #66 | 1,592 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1999 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #44 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #462 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #22 | 1,824 | 0 | 5 | 1989 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #57 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #26 | 1,846 | 0 | 6 | 1990 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #54 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #20 | 1,839 | 0 | 7 | 1991 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2003 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #18 | 1,826 | 0 | 9 | 1992 | 32–28 | 53.3% | #39 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2004 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #57 | 1,698 | 0 | 9 | 1993 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #42 | 1,762 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2005 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #230 | 1,664 | 0 | 9 | 1994 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #37 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #19 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 30–27 | 52.6% | #25 | 1,746 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #70 | 1,676 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #74 | 1,663 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #178 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 |