H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Sjeng Schalken vs Paul-Henri Mathieu H2H: 0-1
Paul-Henri Mathieu holds a 1–0 lead over Sjeng Schalken in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Paul-Henri Mathieu leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Paul-Henri Mathieu won the 2002 Moscow final 4-6 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 49
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 44
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 2002* | Moscow | ATP 250 | F | Carpet | Paul-Henri Mathieu | 4-6 6-2 6-0 | Sjeng Schalken | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sjeng Schalken | #677 | #11 | 1,790 | 1,934 | 280 | 254 | 52.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Paul-Henri Mathieu | #914 | #12 | 2,000 | 1,961 | 268 | 297 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sjeng Schalken | Paul-Henri Mathieu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #69 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #275 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1996 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #150 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #59 | 1,632 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #36 | 1,838 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1998 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #66 | 1,592 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #83 | 1,683 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1999 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #44 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 | 2004 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #123 | 1,661 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2000 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #22 | 1,824 | 0 | 5 | 2005 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #46 | 1,720 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2001 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #26 | 1,846 | 0 | 6 | 2006 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #55 | 1,668 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2002 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #20 | 1,839 | 0 | 7 | 2007 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #25 | 1,870 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2003 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #18 | 1,826 | 0 | 9 | 2008 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #31 | 1,746 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2004 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #57 | 1,698 | 0 | 9 | 2009 | 28–29 | 49.1% | #33 | 1,748 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2005 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #230 | 1,664 | 0 | 9 | 2010 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #97 | 1,731 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #58 | 1,822 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 6–19 | 24.0% | #129 | 1,720 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #96 | 1,759 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #95 | 1,761 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #73 | 1,679 | 0 | 4 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #249 | 1,574 | 0 | 4 |