H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Sjeng Schalken vs Pete Sampras H2H: 0-5

Pete Sampras holds a 5–0 lead over Sjeng Schalken in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Pete Sampras leads 5–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Pete Sampras won the 2002 US Open semifinal 7-6(6) 7-6(4) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sjeng Schalken
NED Age 49 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0 – 5
5 main draw meetings
Pete Sampras
USA Age 54 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 8, 2002* US Open Grand Slam SF Hard Pete Sampras #17 7-6(6) 7-6(4) 6-2 Sjeng Schalken #25 Match data
Feb 28, 1998* Philadelphia ATP 250 QF Hard Pete Sampras #1 6-2 6-2 Sjeng Schalken #55 Match data
Jan 21, 1998* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Pete Sampras #1 7-5 6-4 6-2 Sjeng Schalken #52 Match data
Mar 1, 1997* Philadelphia ATP 250 SF Hard Pete Sampras #1 3-6 7-5 6-3 Sjeng Schalken #88 Match data
Mar 20, 1996* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Pete Sampras #2 6-3 6-2 Sjeng Schalken #53 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sjeng Schalken #677 #11 1,790 1,934 280 254 52.4% 0 0 0 0 9 9
Pete Sampras #34 #1 5,792 2,265 737 208 78.0% 14 11 7 0 32 64

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sjeng Schalken Pete Sampras
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1988 10–10 50.0% #97 1,605 0 0
17 1994 1–2 33.3% #148 1,501 0 0 1989 18–19 48.6% #81 1,699 0 0
18 1995 17–14 54.8% #69 1,645 0 1 1990 51–19 72.9% #5 2,047 1 4
19 1996 26–26 50.0% #65 1,687 0 2 1991 52–17 75.4% #6 2,091 1 8
20 1997 16–25 39.0% #59 1,632 0 3 1992 66–15 81.5% #3 2,118 1 13
21 1998 22–30 42.3% #66 1,592 0 3 1993 82–15 84.5% #1 2,126 3 21
22 1999 28–26 51.9% #44 1,744 0 4 1994 74–9 89.2% #1 2,196 5 31
23 2000 35–26 57.4% #22 1,824 0 5 1995 66–17 79.5% #1 2,134 7 36
24 2001 36–27 57.1% #26 1,846 0 6 1996 66–10 86.8% #1 2,183 8 44
25 2002 36–27 57.1% #20 1,839 0 7 1997 55–10 84.6% #1 2,187 10 52
26 2003 39–23 62.9% #18 1,826 0 9 1998 61–18 77.2% #1 2,042 11 56
27 2004 17–18 48.6% #57 1,698 0 9 1999 38–9 80.9% #3 2,117 12 61
28 2005 7–10 41.2% #230 1,664 0 9 2000 40–11 78.4% #3 2,068 13 63
29 — — — — — — — 2001 33–15 68.8% #10 2,003 13 63
30 — — — — — — — 2002 25–14 64.1% #13 1,977 14 64