H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Sjeng Schalken vs Raemon Sluiter H2H: 1-1
Sjeng Schalken and Raemon Sluiter are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sjeng Schalken leads 1–0 on grass, while Raemon Sluiter leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Raemon Sluiter won the 2004 Rotterdam fourth round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 49
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
NED
Age 48
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2004* | Rotterdam | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Raemon Sluiter | 6-3 6-4 | Sjeng Schalken | Match data |
| Jun 21, 2003* | S Hertogenbosch | ATP 250 | SF | Grass | Sjeng Schalken | 6-3 6-4 | Raemon Sluiter | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sjeng Schalken | #677 | #11 | 1,790 | 1,934 | 280 | 254 | 52.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Raemon Sluiter | #1,007 | #46 | 742 | 1,749 | 84 | 121 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sjeng Schalken | Raemon Sluiter | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #69 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #716 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1996 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1997 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #59 | 1,632 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #241 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #66 | 1,592 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #162 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #44 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 | 2000 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #95 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #22 | 1,824 | 0 | 5 | 2001 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #131 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #26 | 1,846 | 0 | 6 | 2002 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #71 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #20 | 1,839 | 0 | 7 | 2003 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #59 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2003 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #18 | 1,826 | 0 | 9 | 2004 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #82 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2004 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #57 | 1,698 | 0 | 9 | 2005 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #106 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2005 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #230 | 1,664 | 0 | 9 | 2006 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #119 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #169 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1040 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #197 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |