H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Sjeng Schalken vs Renzo Furlan H2H: 0-1
Renzo Furlan holds a 1–0 lead over Sjeng Schalken in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Renzo Furlan leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Renzo Furlan won the 1994 Hilversum third round 4-6 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 49
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 56
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 1994* | Hilversum | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Renzo Furlan | 4-6 7-5 6-3 | Sjeng Schalken | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sjeng Schalken | #677 | #11 | 1,790 | 1,934 | 280 | 254 | 52.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Renzo Furlan | #1,479 | #19 | 1,235 | 1,844 | 209 | 231 | 47.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sjeng Schalken | Renzo Furlan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #69 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #222 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #59 | 1,632 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #77 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #66 | 1,592 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #52 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #44 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #53 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #22 | 1,824 | 0 | 5 | 1993 | 26–28 | 48.1% | #72 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #26 | 1,846 | 0 | 6 | 1994 | 30–27 | 52.6% | #41 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2002 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #20 | 1,839 | 0 | 7 | 1995 | 37–31 | 54.4% | #29 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2003 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #18 | 1,826 | 0 | 9 | 1996 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #40 | 1,695 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2004 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #57 | 1,698 | 0 | 9 | 1997 | 18–27 | 40.0% | #100 | 1,580 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2005 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #230 | 1,664 | 0 | 9 | 1998 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #144 | 1,514 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #225 | 1,542 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #236 | 1,569 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #190 | 1,554 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #186 | 1,540 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #194 | 1,548 | 0 | 2 |