H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC

Sjeng Schalken vs Sargis Sargsian H2H: 3-2

Sjeng Schalken holds a 3–2 lead over Sargis Sargsian in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Sjeng Schalken leads 3–1 on hard courts, while Sargis Sargsian leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sjeng Schalken won the 2004 Dubai third round 6-3 6-1.

NED Age 49 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
3 2
5 main draw meetings
ARM Age 53 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 4, 2004* Dubai ATP 250 R32 Hard Sjeng Schalken #15 6-3 6-1 Sargis Sargsian #43 Match data
Sep 1, 2002* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Sjeng Schalken #25 7-5 6-3 3-6 6-1 Sargis Sargsian #92 Match data
Sep 15, 2001* Tashkent ATP 250 QF Hard Sargis Sargsian #103 7-6(2) 2-6 6-4 Sjeng Schalken #23 Match data
May 31, 2000* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Sargis Sargsian #60 5-7 3-6 7-6(1) 6-3 6-2 Sjeng Schalken #39 Match data
Aug 27, 1999* Boston ATP 250 R16 Hard Sjeng Schalken #51 6-2 6-3 Sargis Sargsian #60 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sjeng Schalken #677 #11 1,790 1,934 280 254 52.4% 0 0 0 0 9 9
Sargis Sargsian #1,525 #38 978 1,811 155 205 43.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sjeng Schalken Sargis Sargsian
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1994 1–2 33.3% #148 1,501 0 0
18 1995 17–14 54.8% #69 1,645 0 1
19 1996 26–26 50.0% #65 1,687 0 2
20 1997 16–25 39.0% #59 1,632 0 3 1993 1–1 50.0% #615 1,514 0 0
21 1998 22–30 42.3% #66 1,592 0 3
22 1999 28–26 51.9% #44 1,744 0 4 1995 2–2 50.0% #220 1,568 0 0
23 2000 35–26 57.4% #22 1,824 0 5 1996 3–5 37.5% #104 1,569 0 0
24 2001 36–27 57.1% #26 1,846 0 6 1997 18–23 43.9% #69 1,674 0 1
25 2002 36–27 57.1% #20 1,839 0 7 1998 18–25 41.9% #98 1,623 0 1
26 2003 39–23 62.9% #18 1,826 0 9 1999 21–23 47.7% #59 1,637 0 1
27 2004 17–18 48.6% #57 1,698 0 9 2000 15–25 37.5% #94 1,584 0 1
28 2005 7–10 41.2% #230 1,664 0 9 2001 16–19 45.7% #72 1,628 0 1
29 2002 13–19 40.6% #103 1,650 0 1
30 2003 28–26 51.9% #39 1,774 0 1
31 2004 17–26 39.5% #75 1,699 0 1
32 2005 3–9 25.0% #294 1,588 0 1
33 2006 0–2 0.0% #809 1,576 0 1