H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Sjeng Schalken vs Sebastien Grosjean H2H: 0-1
Sebastien Grosjean holds a 1–0 lead over Sjeng Schalken in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sebastien Grosjean leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sebastien Grosjean won the 2000 Miami Masters second round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 49
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 48
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2000* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Sebastien Grosjean | 6-4 6-3 | Sjeng Schalken | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sjeng Schalken | #677 | #11 | 1,790 | 1,934 | 280 | 254 | 52.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Sebastien Grosjean | #720 | #4 | 2,865 | 1,960 | 320 | 236 | 57.6% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sjeng Schalken | Sebastien Grosjean | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #69 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #145 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #59 | 1,632 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #88 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #66 | 1,592 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #27 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #44 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 | 2000 | 42–27 | 60.9% | #19 | 1,836 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2000 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #22 | 1,824 | 0 | 5 | 2001 | 48–23 | 67.6% | #6 | 1,943 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2001 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #26 | 1,846 | 0 | 6 | 2002 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #17 | 1,907 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2002 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #20 | 1,839 | 0 | 7 | 2003 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #10 | 1,804 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2003 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #18 | 1,826 | 0 | 9 | 2004 | 25–14 | 64.1% | #15 | 1,821 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2004 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #57 | 1,698 | 0 | 9 | 2005 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #25 | 1,842 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2005 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #230 | 1,664 | 0 | 9 | 2006 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #28 | 1,767 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #53 | 1,765 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #170 | 1,650 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #677 | 1,620 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #722 | 1,578 | 0 | 4 |