H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Sjeng Schalken vs Sebastien Lareau H2H: 1-1
Sjeng Schalken and Sebastien Lareau are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sjeng Schalken leads 1–0 on carpet, while Sebastien Lareau leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sebastien Lareau won the 1999 Tokyo fourth round 2-6 7-6(3) 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 49
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 53
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 1999* | Tokyo | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Sebastien Lareau | 2-6 7-6(3) 7-6(4) | Sjeng Schalken | Match data |
| Nov 7, 1996* | Moscow | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Sjeng Schalken | 6-4 6-4 | Sebastien Lareau | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sjeng Schalken | #677 | #11 | 1,790 | 1,934 | 280 | 254 | 52.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Sebastien Lareau | #1,018 | #76 | 622 | 1,719 | 82 | 120 | 40.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sjeng Schalken | Sebastien Lareau | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1015 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #69 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #349 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1996 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #197 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #59 | 1,632 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #131 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #66 | 1,592 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 3–13 | 18.8% | #119 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #44 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 | 1995 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #136 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #22 | 1,824 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #105 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #26 | 1,846 | 0 | 6 | 1997 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #187 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #20 | 1,839 | 0 | 7 | 1998 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #79 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2003 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #18 | 1,826 | 0 | 9 | 1999 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #102 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2004 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #57 | 1,698 | 0 | 9 | 2000 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #124 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2005 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #230 | 1,664 | 0 | 9 | 2001 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #229 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |