H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Sjeng Schalken vs Stefan Koubek H2H: 1-2
Stefan Koubek holds a 2–1 lead over Sjeng Schalken in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Stefan Koubek leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Sjeng Schalken leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Stefan Koubek won the 2004 Madrid Masters second round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 49
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 49
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 2004* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Stefan Koubek | 6-4 6-4 | Sjeng Schalken | Match data |
| Aug 9, 2001* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Stefan Koubek | 6-1 7-6(5) | Sjeng Schalken | Match data |
| Jun 27, 2001* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Sjeng Schalken | 6-4 3-6 6-4 6-7(2) 7-5 | Stefan Koubek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sjeng Schalken | #677 | #11 | 1,790 | 1,934 | 280 | 254 | 52.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Stefan Koubek | #906 | #20 | 1,143 | 1,794 | 195 | 235 | 45.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sjeng Schalken | Stefan Koubek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1219 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1995 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #69 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #311 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #59 | 1,632 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #125 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #66 | 1,592 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #44 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 | 1999 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #46 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2000 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #22 | 1,824 | 0 | 5 | 2000 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #54 | 1,627 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2001 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #26 | 1,846 | 0 | 6 | 2001 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #63 | 1,698 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2002 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #20 | 1,839 | 0 | 7 | 2002 | 18–31 | 36.7% | #54 | 1,578 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2003 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #18 | 1,826 | 0 | 9 | 2003 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #53 | 1,647 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2004 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #57 | 1,698 | 0 | 9 | 2004 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #60 | 1,754 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2005 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #230 | 1,664 | 0 | 9 | 2005 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #182 | 1,568 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #80 | 1,693 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #47 | 1,760 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #192 | 1,703 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #135 | 1,636 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #131 | 1,632 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #647 | 1,602 | 0 | 3 |