H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Sjeng Schalken vs Stephane Simian H2H: 0-1
Stephane Simian holds a 1–0 lead over Sjeng Schalken in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Stephane Simian leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Stephane Simian won the 1996 Marseille fourth round 4-6 7-6(7) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 49
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 59
Left-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16, 1996* | Marseille | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Stephane Simian | 4-6 7-6(7) 6-4 | Sjeng Schalken | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sjeng Schalken | #677 | #11 | 1,790 | 1,934 | 280 | 254 | 52.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Stephane Simian | #1,306 | #41 | 718 | 1,690 | 45 | 80 | 36.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sjeng Schalken | Stephane Simian | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #69 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1997 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #59 | 1,632 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1998 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #66 | 1,592 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1999 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #44 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2000 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #22 | 1,824 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2001 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #26 | 1,846 | 0 | 6 | 1991 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #191 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #20 | 1,839 | 0 | 7 | 1992 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #106 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2003 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #18 | 1,826 | 0 | 9 | 1993 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #75 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2004 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #57 | 1,698 | 0 | 9 | 1994 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #178 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2005 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #230 | 1,664 | 0 | 9 | 1995 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #364 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #92 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #182 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #370 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |