H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Sjeng Schalken vs Tim Henman H2H: 1-4

Tim Henman holds a 4–1 lead over Sjeng Schalken in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Tim Henman leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tim Henman won the 2003 Vienna fourth round 6-2 2-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sjeng Schalken
NED Age 49 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1 – 4
5 main draw meetings
Tim Henman
GBR Age 51 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 10, 2003* Vienna ATP 250 R16 Hard Tim Henman #40 6-2 2-6 6-2 Sjeng Schalken #14 Match data
Jul 1, 2001* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Tim Henman #11 5-7 6-3 6-4 6-2 Sjeng Schalken #28 Match data
Jun 1, 2001* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Tim Henman #11 6-4 6-2 6-2 Sjeng Schalken #31 Match data
Jan 7, 1999* Doha ATP 250 R32 Hard Tim Henman #7 6-2 6-3 Sjeng Schalken #66 Match data
May 22, 1997* St. Poelten ATP 250 R32 Clay Sjeng Schalken #81 6-4 6-2 Tim Henman #17 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sjeng Schalken #677 #11 1,790 1,934 280 254 52.4% 0 0 0 0 9 9
Tim Henman #615 #4 2,826 2,027 468 260 64.3% 0 1 0 0 10 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sjeng Schalken Tim Henman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1994 1–2 33.3% #148 1,501 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1995 17–14 54.8% #69 1,645 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 1996 26–26 50.0% #65 1,687 0 2 1994 3–5 37.5% #167 1,513 0 0
20 1997 16–25 39.0% #59 1,632 0 3 1995 7–7 50.0% #95 1,584 0 0
21 1998 22–30 42.3% #66 1,592 0 3 1996 37–24 60.7% #29 1,821 0 0
22 1999 28–26 51.9% #44 1,744 0 4 1997 47–23 67.1% #17 1,895 0 2
23 2000 35–26 57.4% #22 1,824 0 5 1998 55–29 65.5% #7 1,960 0 4
24 2001 36–27 57.1% #26 1,846 0 6 1999 41–25 62.1% #12 1,785 0 4
25 2002 36–27 57.1% #20 1,839 0 7 2000 55–23 70.5% #10 1,953 0 6
26 2003 39–23 62.9% #18 1,826 0 9 2001 49–20 71.0% #9 1,924 0 8
27 2004 17–18 48.6% #57 1,698 0 9 2002 45–18 71.4% #8 1,867 0 9
28 2005 7–10 41.2% #230 1,664 0 9 2003 30–16 65.2% #15 1,970 0 11
29 — — — — — — — 2004 41–20 67.2% #6 1,926 0 11
30 — — — — — — — 2005 23–18 56.1% #36 1,746 0 11
31 — — — — — — — 2006 31–20 60.8% #39 1,868 0 11
32 — — — — — — — 2007 4–12 25.0% #292 1,684 0 11