H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Sjeng Schalken vs Tommy Haas H2H: 1-3

Tommy Haas holds a 3–1 lead over Sjeng Schalken in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Tommy Haas leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tommy Haas won the 2002 Canada Masters third round 6-3 3-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sjeng Schalken
NED Age 49 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main draw meetings
Tommy Haas
GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 1, 2002* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Tommy Haas #3 6-3 3-6 6-3 Sjeng Schalken #22 Match data
May 16, 2002* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Tommy Haas #2 7-5 6-3 Sjeng Schalken #34 Match data
Oct 18, 2001* Stuttgart Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Tommy Haas #14 4-6 7-6(2) 6-2 Sjeng Schalken #32 Match data
Jan 17, 1999* Auckland ATP 250 F Hard Sjeng Schalken #74 6-4 6-4 Tommy Haas #35 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sjeng Schalken #677 #11 1,790 1,934 280 254 52.4% 0 0 0 0 9 9
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,103 533 330 61.8% 0 1 0 3 11 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sjeng Schalken Tommy Haas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1994 1–2 33.3% #148 1,501 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1995 17–14 54.8% #69 1,645 0 1 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,587 0 0
19 1996 26–26 50.0% #65 1,687 0 2 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,721 0 0
20 1997 16–25 39.0% #59 1,632 0 3 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,840 0 0
21 1998 22–30 42.3% #66 1,592 0 3 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,859 0 1
22 1999 28–26 51.9% #44 1,744 0 4 2000 27–20 57.4% #23 1,777 0 1
23 2000 35–26 57.4% #22 1,824 0 5 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,009 0 5
24 2001 36–27 57.1% #26 1,846 0 6 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,849 0 5
25 2002 36–27 57.1% #20 1,839 0 7 — — — — — — —
26 2003 39–23 62.9% #18 1,826 0 9 2004 35–18 66.0% #17 1,909 0 7
27 2004 17–18 48.6% #57 1,698 0 9 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,766 0 7
28 2005 7–10 41.2% #230 1,664 0 9 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,893 0 10
29 — — — — — — — 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,892 0 11
30 — — — — — — — 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,855 0 11
31 — — — — — — — 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,913 0 12
32 — — — — — — — 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,844 0 12
33 — — — — — — — 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,762 0 12
34 — — — — — — — 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,966 0 13
35 — — — — — — — 2013 46–23 66.7% #12 2,011 0 15
36 — — — — — — — 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,904 0 15
37 — — — — — — — 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,784 0 15
39 — — — — — — — 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,686 0 15