H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Sjeng Schalken vs Vincent Spadea H2H: 4-3

Sjeng Schalken holds a 4–3 lead over Vincent Spadea in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Vincent Spadea leads 2–1 on clay, while Sjeng Schalken leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sjeng Schalken won the 2004 Wimbledon fourth round 6-2 7-5 3-6 6-2.

NED Age 49 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
4 3
7 main draw meetings
USA Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 30, 2004* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Sjeng Schalken #23 6-2 7-5 3-6 6-2 Vincent Spadea #30 Match data
Sep 13, 2003* Costa Do Sauipe ATP 250 QF Hard Sjeng Schalken #13 7-6(0) 6-2 Vincent Spadea #31 Match data
Oct 21, 1999* Lyon ATP 250 R32 Carpet Vincent Spadea #22 2-6 6-1 6-4 Sjeng Schalken #54 Match data
Jan 14, 1999* Auckland ATP 250 R32 Hard Sjeng Schalken #74 7-6(6) 6-4 Vincent Spadea #46 Match data
May 23, 1998* St. Poelten ATP 250 QF Clay Vincent Spadea #62 7-6(3) 6-1 Sjeng Schalken #51 Match data
Oct 26, 1995* Santiago ATP 250 R32 Clay Sjeng Schalken #56 5-7 6-4 6-4 Vincent Spadea #76 Match data
Jul 13, 1995* Gstaad ATP 250 R32 Clay Vincent Spadea #64 6-3 6-4 Sjeng Schalken #82 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sjeng Schalken #677 #11 1,790 1,934 280 254 52.4% 0 0 0 0 9 9
Vincent Spadea #1,474 #18 1,629 1,876 310 348 47.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Sjeng Schalken Vincent Spadea
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1994 1–2 33.3% #148 1,501 0 0 1993 1–5 16.7% #303 1,483 0 0
1995 17–14 54.8% #69 1,645 0 1 1994 11–13 45.8% #75 1,561 0 0
1996 26–26 50.0% #65 1,687 0 2 1995 21–28 42.9% #81 1,639 0 0
1997 16–25 39.0% #59 1,632 0 3 1996 27–22 55.1% #54 1,711 0 0
1998 22–30 42.3% #66 1,592 0 3 1997 20–26 43.5% #88 1,695 0 0
1999 28–26 51.9% #44 1,744 0 4 1998 28–27 50.9% #42 1,752 0 0
2000 35–26 57.4% #22 1,824 0 5 1999 33–27 55.0% #20 1,763 0 0
2001 36–27 57.1% #26 1,846 0 6 2000 3–23 11.5% #213 1,545 0 0
2002 36–27 57.1% #20 1,839 0 7 2001 1–3 25.0% #125 1,534 0 0
2003 39–23 62.9% #18 1,826 0 9 2002 13–17 43.3% #67 1,623 0 0
2004 17–18 48.6% #57 1,698 0 9 2003 34–25 57.6% #29 1,723 0 0
2005 7–10 41.2% #230 1,664 0 9 2004 39–25 60.9% #20 1,784 0 1
2005 21–24 46.7% #75 1,665 0 1
2006 19–26 42.2% #73 1,627 0 1
2007 24–28 46.2% #77 1,650 0 1
2008 13–19 40.6% #76 1,657 0 1
2009 2–9 18.2% #295 1,526 0 1
2010 0–1 0.0% #1517 1,480 0 1