H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC

Sjeng Schalken vs Wayne Arthurs H2H: 4-1

Sjeng Schalken holds a 4–1 lead over Wayne Arthurs in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Sjeng Schalken leads 2–0 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Sjeng Schalken won the 2004 Rome Masters second round 6-3 4-6 6-1.

NED Age 49 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
4 1
5 main draw meetings
AUS Age 55 Left-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 5, 2004* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Sjeng Schalken #16 6-3 4-6 6-1 Wayne Arthurs #91 Match data
May 2, 2003* Munich ATP 250 R16 Clay Sjeng Schalken #11 7-6(4) 6-3 Wayne Arthurs #55 Match data
Jun 15, 2002* Queen's Club ATP 250 QF Grass Sjeng Schalken #34 6-3 7-6(4) Wayne Arthurs #126 Match data
Oct 26, 2001* Stockholm ATP 250 R16 Hard Sjeng Schalken #40 6-4 6-3 Wayne Arthurs #82 Match data
Mar 1, 2001* San Jose ATP 250 R32 Hard Wayne Arthurs #71 6-4 6-4 Sjeng Schalken #28 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sjeng Schalken #677 #11 1,790 1,934 280 254 52.4% 0 0 0 0 9 9
Wayne Arthurs #368 #44 833 1,781 122 152 44.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sjeng Schalken Wayne Arthurs
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1994 1–2 33.3% #148 1,501 0 0
18 1995 17–14 54.8% #69 1,645 0 1
19 1996 26–26 50.0% #65 1,687 0 2
20 1997 16–25 39.0% #59 1,632 0 3
21 1998 22–30 42.3% #66 1,592 0 3
22 1999 28–26 51.9% #44 1,744 0 4
23 2000 35–26 57.4% #22 1,824 0 5
24 2001 36–27 57.1% #26 1,846 0 6
25 2002 36–27 57.1% #20 1,839 0 7 1996 1–2 33.3% #561 1,499 0 0
26 2003 39–23 62.9% #18 1,826 0 9
27 2004 17–18 48.6% #57 1,698 0 9 1998 4–3 57.1% #187 1,568 0 0
28 2005 7–10 41.2% #230 1,664 0 9 1999 12–11 52.2% #105 1,651 0 0
29 2000 13–18 41.9% #83 1,700 0 0
30 2001 19–23 45.2% #77 1,638 0 0
31 2002 23–24 48.9% #52 1,700 0 0
32 2003 11–22 33.3% #117 1,612 0 0
33 2004 12–19 38.7% #101 1,567 0 0
34 2005 17–18 48.6% #97 1,624 0 1
35 2006 6–10 37.5% #161 1,626 0 1
36 2007 4–2 66.7% #244 1,668 0 1