H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Sjeng Schalken vs Wayne Ferreira H2H: 2-5

Wayne Ferreira holds a 5–2 lead over Sjeng Schalken in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Wayne Ferreira leads 3–1 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Sjeng Schalken won the 2002 Moscow fourth round 7-5 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sjeng Schalken
NED Age 49 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2 – 5
7 main draw meetings
Wayne Ferreira
RSA Age 54 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 4, 2002* Moscow ATP 250 R16 Carpet Sjeng Schalken #17 7-5 6-0 Wayne Ferreira #33 Match data
Aug 8, 2001* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Sjeng Schalken #32 6-4 6-4 Wayne Ferreira #35 Match data
Mar 9, 2000* Scottsdale ATP 250 R32 Hard Wayne Ferreira #48 6-7(4) 6-4 6-4 Sjeng Schalken #54 Match data
May 6, 1999* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Wayne Ferreira #24 6-4 6-3 Sjeng Schalken #53 Match data
Apr 22, 1998* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Wayne Ferreira #33 4-6 6-2 6-4 Sjeng Schalken #61 Match data
Mar 7, 1996* Scottsdale ATP 250 R32 Hard Wayne Ferreira #10 7-5 6-1 Sjeng Schalken #51 Match data
Sep 14, 1995* Bordeaux ATP 250 R32 Hard Wayne Ferreira #10 6-3 6-4 Sjeng Schalken #81 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sjeng Schalken #677 #11 1,790 1,934 280 254 52.4% 0 0 0 0 9 9
Wayne Ferreira #1,099 #6 2,701 2,022 483 314 60.6% 0 2 0 0 13 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sjeng Schalken Wayne Ferreira
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1994 1–2 33.3% #148 1,501 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1995 17–14 54.8% #69 1,645 0 1 1990 2–5 28.6% #173 1,529 0 0
19 1996 26–26 50.0% #65 1,687 0 2 1991 26–21 55.3% #41 1,712 0 0
20 1997 16–25 39.0% #59 1,632 0 3 1992 48–24 66.7% #12 1,847 0 2
21 1998 22–30 42.3% #66 1,592 0 3 1993 38–25 60.3% #22 1,819 0 2
22 1999 28–26 51.9% #44 1,744 0 4 1994 66–25 72.5% #12 1,923 0 7
23 2000 35–26 57.4% #22 1,824 0 5 1995 55–25 68.8% #9 1,925 0 11
24 2001 36–27 57.1% #26 1,846 0 6 1996 45–24 65.2% #10 1,838 0 13
25 2002 36–27 57.1% #20 1,839 0 7 1997 26–22 54.2% #42 1,809 0 13
26 2003 39–23 62.9% #18 1,826 0 9 1998 33–24 57.9% #26 1,823 0 13
27 2004 17–18 48.6% #57 1,698 0 9 1999 27–25 51.9% #53 1,704 0 13
28 2005 7–10 41.2% #230 1,664 0 9 2000 41–21 66.1% #13 1,895 0 14
29 — — — — — — — 2001 16–21 43.2% #62 1,707 0 14
30 — — — — — — — 2002 24–18 57.1% #39 1,811 0 14
31 — — — — — — — 2003 24–19 55.8% #26 1,762 0 15
32 — — — — — — — 2004 12–15 44.4% #128 1,692 0 15