H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Slava Dosedel vs Andrea Gaudenzi H2H: 2-2

Slava Dosedel and Andrea Gaudenzi are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Andrea Gaudenzi leads 2–1 on clay, while Slava Dosedel leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Slava Dosedel won the 1998 Adelaide International round of 32 4-6 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Slava Dosedel
CZE Age 56 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Andrea Gaudenzi
ITA Age 53 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Slava Dosedel #43 4-6 6-2 6-1 Andrea Gaudenzi #57 Match data Jan 8, 1998* R32 Adelaide International ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Andrea Gaudenzi #25 6-2 6-0 Slava Dosedel #72 Match data Aug 12, 1995* QF San Marino ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Andrea Gaudenzi #20 7-5 6-2 Slava Dosedel #65 Match data Jul 13, 1995* R32 Swiss Open Gstaad ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Slava Dosedel #30 6-3 6-3 Andrea Gaudenzi #35 Match data May 21, 1994* QF Bologna ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Slava Dosedel #1,027 #26 1,122 1,826 190 185 50.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Andrea Gaudenzi #1,441 #18 1,522 1,867 206 221 48.2% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Slava Dosedel Andrea Gaudenzi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1990 0–1 0.0% #861 1,489 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1991 0–3 0.0% #632 1,456 0 0
18 1989 0–2 0.0% #265 1,468 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1990 1–3 25.0% #146 1,467 0 0 1993 17–10 63.0% #60 1,670 0 0
20 1991 4–13 23.5% #201 1,444 0 0 1994 36–29 55.4% #24 1,775 0 0
21 1992 3–3 50.0% #159 1,497 0 0 1995 31–25 55.4% #22 1,682 0 0
22 1993 16–15 51.6% #68 1,608 0 0 1996 26–27 49.1% #55 1,657 0 0
23 1994 36–23 61.0% #29 1,733 0 0 1997 14–20 41.2% #57 1,641 0 0
24 1995 27–25 51.9% #60 1,696 0 1 1998 30–24 55.6% #44 1,678 0 1
25 1996 21–13 61.8% #66 1,768 0 2 1999 13–14 48.1% #84 1,646 0 1
26 1997 24–18 57.1% #43 1,763 0 3 2000 8–16 33.3% #101 1,591 0 1
27 1998 21–21 50.0% #64 1,690 0 3 2001 17–19 47.2% #54 1,694 0 3
28 1999 15–12 55.6% #63 1,740 0 3 2002 11–26 29.7% #120 1,534 0 3
29 2000 17–21 44.7% #64 1,704 0 3 2003 3–7 30.0% #293 1,533 0 3
30 2001 5–16 23.8% #152 1,568 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Slava Dosedel Andrea Gaudenzi
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1989 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1990 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 1993 2 1 3 66.7% 15 8 23 65.2% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1991 2 6 8 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 1994 6 8 14 42.9% 25 14 39 64.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
21 1992 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 1995 9 6 15 60.0% 22 15 37 59.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
22 1993 2 2 4 50.0% 14 12 26 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1996 9 11 20 45.0% 14 9 23 60.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
23 1994 — — — — 35 20 55 63.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1997 0 3 3 0.0% 14 16 30 46.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1995 — — — — 21 18 39 53.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1998 6 12 18 33.3% 24 12 36 66.7% — — — — — — — —
25 1996 1 1 2 50.0% 20 11 31 64.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 0 1 1 0.0% 13 13 26 50.0% — — — — — — — —
26 1997 8 8 16 50.0% 16 7 23 69.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 4 7 11 36.4% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 1998 5 8 13 38.5% 15 11 26 57.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2001 2 10 12 16.7% 14 5 19 73.7% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0%
28 1999 8 6 14 57.1% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2002 3 9 12 25.0% 8 15 23 34.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2000 11 12 23 47.8% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2003 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
30 2001 1 7 8 12.5% 3 7 10 30.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 38 51 89 42.7% 141 110 251 56.2% 5 10 15 33.3% 6 14 20 30.0% — 41 70 111 36.9% 155 123 278 55.8% 1 9 10 10.0% 9 19 28 32.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 320/369 of Slava Dosedel's and 376/426 of Andrea Gaudenzi's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Slava Dosedel Andrea Gaudenzi
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 3/3 1.3 3.7 72.4% 59.4% 28.8% 53.3% 20.8% 51.6% 32.3%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1993 25/27 1.8 2.4 68.8% 67.1% 47.0% 54.4% 53.6% 61.2% 41.7%
20 1991 14/17 4.0 5.3 48.4% 67.2% 50.9% 45.0% 32.3% 58.2% 34.6% 1994 59/65 2.2 2.9 66.5% 66.0% 50.2% 58.4% 37.6% 60.5% 40.8%
21 1992 5/6 1.8 2.2 73.6% 55.7% 58.2% 50.3% 42.2% 54.9% 41.0% 1995 55/56 1.5 2.8 60.6% 69.1% 48.6% 60.9% 40.7% 61.2% 40.8%
22 1993 28/31 2.4 2.5 65.2% 60.9% 47.1% 47.5% 46.3% 56.1% 43.4% 1996 43/53 1.7 3.3 63.5% 64.8% 50.7% 56.2% 40.2% 59.6% 40.9%
23 1994 54/59 1.9 2.7 68.8% 63.7% 48.8% 52.1% 49.4% 57.9% 44.8% 1997 29/34 2.0 3.4 61.2% 65.4% 46.0% 48.8% 47.4% 57.6% 40.3%
24 1995 45/52 2.9 2.4 65.2% 65.6% 50.0% 56.9% 47.0% 59.5% 41.4% 1998 42/54 2.6 3.8 62.4% 67.5% 48.5% 47.2% 44.2% 60.0% 38.5%
25 1996 29/34 2.0 1.4 68.4% 65.5% 51.1% 57.7% 43.7% 60.2% 45.0% 1999 23/27 1.7 2.5 64.8% 62.9% 47.7% 60.5% 45.1% 57.2% 40.4%
26 1997 35/42 3.2 2.4 66.1% 65.9% 52.9% 52.4% 43.1% 61.3% 41.8% 2000 21/24 3.8 3.7 57.8% 65.2% 48.1% 52.5% 41.8% 57.6% 39.1%
27 1998 38/42 3.3 2.7 61.6% 66.7% 48.4% 58.9% 42.4% 59.6% 41.6% 2001 30/36 4.2 3.9 54.9% 69.8% 51.7% 54.4% 39.2% 61.5% 38.3%
28 1999 21/27 3.9 2.4 66.9% 66.1% 50.4% 61.8% 41.9% 60.8% 41.7% 2002 36/37 3.3 4.8 53.2% 69.3% 46.2% 51.8% 42.1% 58.3% 37.0%
29 2000 32/38 1.8 2.3 69.3% 65.2% 52.2% 59.5% 42.1% 60.7% 41.0% 2003 10/10 2.3 3.8 58.1% 65.9% 45.7% 49.0% 35.4% 57.0% 34.8%
30 2001 19/21 2.0 3.8 63.4% 60.5% 43.2% 54.7% 47.2% 54.3% 37.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 320/375 2.6 2.6 65.6% 64.6% 49.8% 54.9% 44.5% 59.0% 42.0% — 376/427 2.4 3.3 61.6% 66.8% 48.5% 54.8% 42.0% 59.6% 39.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Slava Dosedel Andrea Gaudenzi
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1489 101.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.03
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1456 97.8 -1.84 -2.41 0.666 42.1% — +45 — 14.3% -2.71 0–1 — — +0.18
18 1989 1469 96.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–2 — — +0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1990 1467 113.7 — — — — — +37 — 33.3% -0.89 0–1 1–0 — -0.06 1993 1670 138.3 +0.72 +0.59 1.074 51.5% -107 +47 — 61.9% +0.75 6–5 (55%) 8–2 (80%) — +0.33
20 1991 1445 114.9 -2.50 -2.28 0.827 46.2% +54 +61 — 31.1% -0.98 2–4 (33%) 1–4 (20%) — +0.74 1994 1775 146.5 -0.33 +2.81 1.032 50.5% -85 +58 -229 50.0% +0.09 13–5 (72%) 9–7 (56%) — -2.78
21 1992 1497 106.4 -0.76 -0.97 0.911 48.6% — +42 — 33.3% -1.42 1–0 0–1 — -0.15 1995 1683 147.0 +0.24 +2.23 1.049 50.7% +5 +132 — 54.1% +0.20 8–7 (53%) 10–8 (56%) — +0.04
22 1993 1608 124.0 -3.61 +2.59 0.988 49.7% -110 +72 — 52.8% +0.04 3–2 (60%) 3–2 (60%) — +2.06 1996 1657 140.7 -1.41 +2.12 1.013 50.2% +8 +119 -108 49.2% +0.03 7–10 (41%) 10–9 (53%) — +0.03
23 1994 1734 143.4 -1.39 +4.58 1.062 51.3% — +97 — 56.7% +0.38 13–5 (72%) 8–7 (53%) — +0.20 1997 1641 129.7 -2.44 +1.67 0.950 49.0% -36 +61 — 46.2% -0.30 4–6 (40%) 3–4 (43%) — -1.16
24 1995 1697 126.8 -1.34 +1.49 1.022 50.5% -185 +56 — 52.0% +0.22 7–9 (44%) 8–5 (62%) — +2.45 1998 1678 136.1 -0.82 +0.58 0.964 49.2% -115 +126 — 51.4% +0.14 15–6 (71%) 7–9 (44%) — +1.21
25 1996 1769 147.2 -0.26 +4.43 1.131 52.5% -253 +59 — 61.8% +0.87 4–5 (44%) 5–9 (36%) — -1.58 1999 1646 124.2 -2.64 +0.64 0.944 48.8% — +88 — 45.6% -0.29 5–3 (63%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.59
26 1997 1763 139.2 -0.53 +2.85 1.080 51.3% -158 +141 — 51.8% +0.17 11–6 (65%) 13–6 (68%) — -0.78 2000 1592 119.8 -2.54 +0.58 0.923 48.4% -48 +48 — 39.4% -0.48 3–8 (27%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.05
27 1998 1690 137.3 -1.23 +2.78 1.030 50.6% -78 +130 -150 47.5% -0.19 5–6 (45%) 10–11 (48%) — -1.69 2001 1694 133.8 +0.11 -0.18 0.993 49.3% -182 +106 — 52.5% -0.26 2–5 (29%) 10–5 (67%) — -2.07
28 1999 1741 128.9 +0.19 +2.72 1.065 50.9% -31 +30 — 59.5% +0.30 2–7 (22%) 7–4 (64%) — +1.11 2002 1534 124.9 -2.65 -0.09 0.889 47.7% -44 +117 — 34.4% -0.82 4–4 (50%) 5–10 (33%) — -0.26
29 2000 1705 136.5 -0.65 +3.11 1.046 50.6% -5 +2 — 49.0% +0.08 2–8 (20%) 6–6 (50%) — -1.55 2003 1533 118.0 -2.25 -2.03 0.810 45.9% -48 +99 — 34.6% -1.23 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — -0.55
30 2001 1569 123.5 -4.55 -0.10 0.823 46.3% +38 +58 — 29.8% -1.35 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) — -0.94 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1826 140.0 -1.41 +2.62 1.023 50.4% -61 +78 -150 50.4% +0.02 52–58 (47%) 64–60 (52%) 99.6 +0.03 — 1868 141.8 -1.03 +1.22 0.982 49.5% -63 +93 -160 48.2% -0.11 69–62 (53%) 67–63 (52%) 105.4 -1.02

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.