H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC
Slava Dosedel vs Andrea Gaudenzi H2H: 2-2
Slava Dosedel and Andrea Gaudenzi are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Andrea Gaudenzi leads 2–1 on clay, while Slava Dosedel leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Slava Dosedel won the 1998 Adelaide third round 4-6 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 52
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 1998* | Adelaide | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Slava Dosedel | 4-6 6-2 6-1 | Andrea Gaudenzi | Match data |
| Aug 12, 1995* | San Marino | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Andrea Gaudenzi | 6-2 6-0 | Slava Dosedel | Match data |
| Jul 13, 1995* | Gstaad | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Andrea Gaudenzi | 7-5 6-2 | Slava Dosedel | Match data |
| May 21, 1994* | Bologna | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Slava Dosedel | 6-3 6-3 | Andrea Gaudenzi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slava Dosedel | #1,027 | #26 | 1,122 | 1,825 | 190 | 184 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Andrea Gaudenzi | #1,441 | #18 | 1,522 | 1,865 | 204 | 220 | 48.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Slava Dosedel | Andrea Gaudenzi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #861 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #632 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #201 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #60 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #24 | 1,773 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #68 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #22 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #29 | 1,731 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #55 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,695 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #57 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 21–13 | 61.8% | #66 | 1,769 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #44 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 |
| 1997 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #43 | 1,762 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #84 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 |
| 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,690 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #101 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 |
| 1999 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #63 | 1,741 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #54 | 1,693 | 0 | 3 |
| 2000 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #64 | 1,722 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 11–26 | 29.7% | #120 | 1,534 | 0 | 3 |
| 2001 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #152 | 1,575 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #293 | 1,533 | 0 | 3 |