H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Slava Dosedel vs Andrei Cherkasov H2H: 1-0
Slava Dosedel holds a 1–0 lead over Andrei Cherkasov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Slava Dosedel leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Slava Dosedel won the 1994 Hilversum third round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 56
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 1994* | Hilversum | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Slava Dosedel | 6-2 6-3 | Andrei Cherkasov | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slava Dosedel | #1,027 | #26 | 1,122 | 1,825 | 190 | 184 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Andrei Cherkasov | #1,174 | #13 | 1,320 | 1,897 | 170 | 198 | 46.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Slava Dosedel | Andrei Cherkasov | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #236 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #82 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #201 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #21 | 1,877 | 0 | 1 |
| 1992 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #21 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 |
| 1993 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #68 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 29–29 | 50.0% | #32 | 1,711 | 0 | 2 |
| 1994 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #29 | 1,731 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 34–31 | 52.3% | #37 | 1,753 | 0 | 2 |
| 1995 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,695 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 8–27 | 22.9% | #172 | 1,554 | 0 | 2 |
| 1996 | 21–13 | 61.8% | #66 | 1,769 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #184 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 |
| 1997 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #43 | 1,762 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #133 | 1,463 | 0 | 2 |
| 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,690 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #164 | 1,485 | 0 | 2 |
| 1999 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #63 | 1,741 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #164 | 1,462 | 0 | 2 |
| 2000 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #64 | 1,722 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #217 | 1,483 | 0 | 2 |
| 2001 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #152 | 1,575 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #198 | 1,452 | 0 | 2 |