H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Slava Dosedel vs Andrei Medvedev H2H: 1-3
Andrei Medvedev holds a 3–1 lead over Slava Dosedel in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Andrei Medvedev leads 2–1 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Andrei Medvedev won the 1994 Prague semifinal 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
UKR
Age 51
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 6, 1994* | Prague | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Andrei Medvedev | 6-3 6-1 | Slava Dosedel | Match data |
| Jun 24, 1994* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Andrei Medvedev | 3-6 7-5 6-1 6-4 | Slava Dosedel | Match data |
| May 14, 1994* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Clay | Slava Dosedel | 6-1 6-2 | Andrei Medvedev | Match data |
| Apr 23, 1994* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Clay | Andrei Medvedev | 6-4 6-3 | Slava Dosedel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slava Dosedel | #1,027 | #26 | 1,122 | 1,825 | 190 | 184 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Andrei Medvedev | #679 | #4 | 2,755 | 2,022 | 303 | 211 | 58.9% | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Slava Dosedel | Andrei Medvedev | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1007 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #227 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #201 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 32–12 | 72.7% | #24 | 1,836 | 0 | 3 |
| 1992 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 58–24 | 70.7% | #6 | 1,943 | 0 | 6 |
| 1993 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #68 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #15 | 1,816 | 0 | 8 |
| 1994 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #29 | 1,731 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 39–26 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,769 | 0 | 9 |
| 1995 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,695 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #35 | 1,775 | 0 | 10 |
| 1996 | 21–13 | 61.8% | #66 | 1,769 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #27 | 1,776 | 0 | 11 |
| 1997 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #43 | 1,762 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #62 | 1,708 | 0 | 11 |
| 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,690 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #30 | 1,722 | 0 | 11 |
| 1999 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #63 | 1,741 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #58 | 1,774 | 0 | 11 |
| 2000 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #64 | 1,722 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #156 | 1,627 | 0 | 11 |
| 2001 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #152 | 1,575 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |