H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Slava Dosedel vs Boris Becker H2H: 1-0
Slava Dosedel holds a 1–0 lead over Boris Becker in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Slava Dosedel leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Slava Dosedel won the 1996 Munich semifinal 7-6(2) 2-6 7-6(6).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 58
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 1996* | Munich | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Slava Dosedel | 7-6(2) 2-6 7-6(6) | Boris Becker | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slava Dosedel | #1,027 | #26 | 1,122 | 1,825 | 190 | 184 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Boris Becker | #257 | #1 | 4,297 | 2,266 | 670 | 219 | 75.4% | 6 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 30 | 49 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Slava Dosedel | Boris Becker | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #201 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 50–18 | 73.5% | #6 | 2,066 | 1 | 3 |
| 1992 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 65–13 | 83.3% | #2 | 2,229 | 2 | 9 |
| 1993 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #68 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 50–15 | 76.9% | #5 | 2,040 | 2 | 12 |
| 1994 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #29 | 1,731 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 50–9 | 84.7% | #4 | 2,180 | 2 | 19 |
| 1995 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,695 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 54–8 | 87.1% | #2 | 2,232 | 4 | 24 |
| 1996 | 21–13 | 61.8% | #66 | 1,769 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 69–14 | 83.1% | #2 | 2,206 | 4 | 29 |
| 1997 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #43 | 1,762 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 46–13 | 78.0% | #3 | 2,112 | 5 | 31 |
| 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,690 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 48–15 | 76.2% | #5 | 2,145 | 5 | 36 |
| 1999 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #63 | 1,741 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #11 | 1,885 | 5 | 38 |
| 2000 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #64 | 1,722 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #3 | 2,052 | 5 | 42 |
| 2001 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #152 | 1,575 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #4 | 2,043 | 5 | 44 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 42–14 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,083 | 6 | 49 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #62 | 1,914 | 6 | 49 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #69 | 1,874 | 6 | 49 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #131 | 1,863 | 6 | 49 |