H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Slava Dosedel vs Carlos Moya H2H: 2-2
Slava Dosedel and Carlos Moya are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Slava Dosedel leads 2–1 on clay, while Carlos Moya leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Carlos Moya won the 2000 US Open second round 6-3 4-6 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 49
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 2000* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Carlos Moya | 6-3 4-6 7-5 6-2 | Slava Dosedel | Match data |
| Oct 2, 1998* | Mallorca | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Carlos Moya | 6-4 6-4 | Slava Dosedel | Match data |
| Aug 3, 1997* | Amsterdam | ATP 250 | F | Clay | Slava Dosedel | 7-6(4) 7-6(5) 6-7(4) 6-2 | Carlos Moya | Match data |
| May 5, 1996* | Munich | ATP 250 | F | Clay | Slava Dosedel | 6-4 4-6 6-3 | Carlos Moya | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slava Dosedel | #1,027 | #26 | 1,122 | 1,825 | 190 | 184 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Carlos Moya | #667 | #1 | 3,516 | 2,033 | 551 | 309 | 64.1% | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 20 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Slava Dosedel | Carlos Moya | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 11–7 | 61.1% | #61 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 |
| 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 42–28 | 60.0% | #28 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 |
| 1991 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #201 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 53–29 | 64.6% | #7 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 |
| 1992 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #5 | 1,894 | 1 | 5 |
| 1993 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #68 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #23 | 1,762 | 1 | 5 |
| 1994 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #29 | 1,731 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #41 | 1,811 | 1 | 6 |
| 1995 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,695 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #19 | 1,735 | 1 | 7 |
| 1996 | 21–13 | 61.8% | #66 | 1,769 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 59–21 | 73.8% | #5 | 1,970 | 1 | 11 |
| 1997 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #43 | 1,762 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #7 | 1,904 | 1 | 14 |
| 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,690 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 53–17 | 75.7% | #5 | 1,903 | 1 | 17 |
| 1999 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #63 | 1,741 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #31 | 1,803 | 1 | 18 |
| 2000 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #64 | 1,722 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #43 | 1,756 | 1 | 19 |
| 2001 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #152 | 1,575 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #17 | 1,862 | 1 | 20 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #42 | 1,802 | 1 | 20 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #446 | 1,715 | 1 | 20 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #516 | 1,651 | 1 | 20 |