H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Slava Dosedel vs Cedric Pioline H2H: 1-4

Cedric Pioline holds a 4–1 lead over Slava Dosedel in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Cedric Pioline leads 2–1 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Cedric Pioline won the 2001 Australian Open second round 7-6(6) 1-6 6-4 6-4.

CZE Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 4
5 main draw meetings
FRA Age 57 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 19, 2001* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Cedric Pioline #17 7-6(6) 1-6 6-4 6-4 Slava Dosedel #72 Match data
Apr 22, 2000* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Cedric Pioline #12 3-6 7-5 6-4 Slava Dosedel #51 Match data
May 9, 1996* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Slava Dosedel #48 7-5 6-1 Cedric Pioline #20 Match data
Sep 14, 1995* Bucharest ATP 250 R32 Clay Cedric Pioline #58 6-0 6-0 Slava Dosedel #62 Match data
Sep 12, 1991* Bordeaux ATP 250 R32 Hard Cedric Pioline #68 6-3 1-6 6-3 Slava Dosedel #135 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Slava Dosedel #1,027 #26 1,122 1,825 190 184 50.8% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Cedric Pioline #750 #5 2,335 1,983 370 301 55.1% 0 1 0 0 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Slava Dosedel Cedric Pioline
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1989 0–2 0.0% #265 1,468 0 0 1989 0–3 0.0% #202 1,483 0 0
1990 1–3 25.0% #146 1,467 0 0 1990 5–12 29.4% #118 1,484 0 0
1991 4–13 23.5% #201 1,444 0 0 1991 21–20 51.2% #51 1,664 0 0
1992 3–3 50.0% #159 1,497 0 0 1992 31–27 53.4% #33 1,845 0 0
1993 16–15 51.6% #68 1,595 0 0 1993 51–27 65.4% #10 1,936 0 0
1994 36–23 61.0% #29 1,731 0 0 1994 29–28 50.9% #51 1,767 0 0
1995 27–25 51.9% #60 1,695 0 1 1995 24–27 47.1% #54 1,760 0 0
1996 21–13 61.8% #66 1,769 0 2 1996 38–21 64.4% #21 1,805 0 1
1997 24–18 57.1% #43 1,762 0 3 1997 37–25 59.7% #20 1,834 0 2
1998 21–21 50.0% #64 1,690 0 3 1998 38–26 59.4% #18 1,764 0 2
1999 15–12 55.6% #63 1,741 0 3 1999 37–28 56.9% #13 1,795 0 3
2000 17–20 45.9% #64 1,722 0 3 2000 32–19 62.7% #16 1,760 0 5
2001 5–16 23.8% #152 1,575 0 3 2001 17–22 43.6% #84 1,657 0 5
2002 10–16 38.5% #119 1,618 0 5