H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Slava Dosedel vs David Prinosil H2H: 1-1
Slava Dosedel and David Prinosil are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Slava Dosedel leads 1–0 on clay, while David Prinosil leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, David Prinosil won the 1997 Adelaide third round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 53
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2, 1997* | Adelaide | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | David Prinosil | 6-3 6-2 | Slava Dosedel | Match data |
| May 11, 1995* | Hamburg Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Slava Dosedel | 6-1 6-4 | David Prinosil | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slava Dosedel | #1,027 | #26 | 1,122 | 1,825 | 190 | 184 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| David Prinosil | #1,091 | #28 | 1,040 | 1,800 | 165 | 208 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Slava Dosedel | David Prinosil | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #125 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #77 | 1,633 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #201 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #130 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #50 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 |
| 1993 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #68 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #39 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 |
| 1994 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #29 | 1,731 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #89 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 |
| 1995 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,695 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #78 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 |
| 1996 | 21–13 | 61.8% | #66 | 1,769 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #66 | 1,672 | 0 | 2 |
| 1997 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #43 | 1,762 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #38 | 1,788 | 0 | 3 |
| 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,690 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 7–22 | 24.1% | #132 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 |
| 1999 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #63 | 1,741 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #229 | 1,593 | 0 | 3 |
| 2000 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #64 | 1,722 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,521 | 0 | 3 |
| 2001 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #152 | 1,575 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1063 | 1,515 | 0 | 3 |