H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Slava Dosedel vs Dennis van Scheppingen H2H: 1-0
Slava Dosedel holds a 1–0 lead over Dennis van Scheppingen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Slava Dosedel leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Slava Dosedel won the 1997 Bastad third round 6-4 6-7(2) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
NED
Age 51
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 10, 1997* | Bastad | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Slava Dosedel | 6-4 6-7(2) 6-2 | Dennis van Scheppingen | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slava Dosedel | #1,027 | #26 | 1,122 | 1,825 | 190 | 184 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Dennis van Scheppingen | #1,545 | #72 | 552 | 1,666 | 42 | 73 | 36.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Slava Dosedel | Dennis van Scheppingen | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #764 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #732 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #201 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #113 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #120 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #68 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #120 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #29 | 1,731 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #439 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,695 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #206 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 21–13 | 61.8% | #66 | 1,769 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #121 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #43 | 1,762 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #156 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,690 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #63 | 1,741 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #112 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #64 | 1,722 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #251 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #152 | 1,575 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #358 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |