H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Slava Dosedel vs Diego Nargiso H2H: 1-0
Slava Dosedel holds a 1–0 lead over Diego Nargiso in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Slava Dosedel leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Slava Dosedel won the 1994 Palermo third round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 56
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 1994* | Palermo | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Slava Dosedel | 6-4 6-3 | Diego Nargiso | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slava Dosedel | #1,027 | #26 | 1,122 | 1,825 | 190 | 184 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Diego Nargiso | #1,400 | #67 | 531 | 1,702 | 94 | 152 | 38.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Slava Dosedel | Diego Nargiso | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #90 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #201 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #150 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #147 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #68 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #109 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #29 | 1,731 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #88 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,695 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 8–23 | 25.8% | #120 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 21–13 | 61.8% | #66 | 1,769 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #118 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #43 | 1,762 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #183 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,690 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #280 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #63 | 1,741 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #152 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #64 | 1,722 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #128 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #152 | 1,575 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #220 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #134 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |