H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Slava Dosedel vs Dinu Pescariu H2H: 1-2
Dinu Pescariu holds a 2–1 lead over Slava Dosedel in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Dinu Pescariu leads 2–0 on clay, while Slava Dosedel leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Dinu Pescariu won the 1999 Monte Carlo Masters second round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 52
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 1999* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Dinu Pescariu | 6-2 6-1 | Slava Dosedel | Match data |
| Jan 20, 1999* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Slava Dosedel | 6-4 6-3 6-3 | Dinu Pescariu | Match data |
| Sep 17, 1993* | Bucharest | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Dinu Pescariu | (w/o) | Slava Dosedel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slava Dosedel | #1,027 | #26 | 1,122 | 1,825 | 190 | 184 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Dinu Pescariu | #1,034 | #75 | 629 | 1,594 | 23 | 55 | 29.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Slava Dosedel | Dinu Pescariu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #410 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #169 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #201 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #217 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #268 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #68 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #406 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #29 | 1,731 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #137 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,695 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #174 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 21–13 | 61.8% | #66 | 1,769 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 3–13 | 18.8% | #80 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #43 | 1,762 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #108 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,690 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #171 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #63 | 1,741 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #555 | 1,446 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #64 | 1,722 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1031 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #152 | 1,575 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |