H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Slava Dosedel vs Felix Mantilla H2H: 2-2
Slava Dosedel and Felix Mantilla are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Felix Mantilla leads 2–1 on clay, while Slava Dosedel leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Slava Dosedel won the 2000 Indian Wells Masters second round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 51
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 2000* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Slava Dosedel | 6-4 6-1 | Felix Mantilla | Match data |
| Apr 16, 1998* | Barcelona | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Slava Dosedel | 6-4 7-6(2) | Felix Mantilla | Match data |
| Aug 17, 1996* | Umag | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Felix Mantilla | 4-2 (ret.) | Slava Dosedel | Match data |
| Aug 10, 1996* | San Marino | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Felix Mantilla | 6-3 5-7 6-4 | Slava Dosedel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slava Dosedel | #1,027 | #26 | 1,122 | 1,825 | 190 | 184 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Felix Mantilla | #1,133 | #10 | 2,385 | 1,960 | 307 | 218 | 58.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Slava Dosedel | Felix Mantilla | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #233 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 10–5 | 66.7% | #92 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #201 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 48–27 | 64.0% | #18 | 1,776 | 0 | 1 |
| 1992 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 49–22 | 69.0% | #16 | 1,846 | 0 | 6 |
| 1993 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #68 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #20 | 1,807 | 0 | 7 |
| 1994 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #29 | 1,731 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #22 | 1,723 | 0 | 8 |
| 1995 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,695 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #99 | 1,670 | 0 | 8 |
| 1996 | 21–13 | 61.8% | #66 | 1,769 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #45 | 1,775 | 0 | 9 |
| 1997 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #43 | 1,762 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #55 | 1,733 | 0 | 9 |
| 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,690 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #22 | 1,709 | 0 | 10 |
| 1999 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #63 | 1,741 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #102 | 1,693 | 0 | 10 |
| 2000 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #64 | 1,722 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #117 | 1,669 | 0 | 10 |
| 2001 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #152 | 1,575 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #425 | 1,650 | 0 | 10 |