H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Slava Dosedel vs Fernando Meligeni H2H: 3-1

Slava Dosedel holds a 3–1 lead over Fernando Meligeni in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Slava Dosedel leads 2–1 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Slava Dosedel won the 2000 Kitzbuhel third round 6-1 6-3.

CZE Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 1
4 main draw meetings
BRA Age 55 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 27, 2000* Kitzbuhel ATP 250 R32 Clay Slava Dosedel #59 6-1 6-3 Fernando Meligeni #102 Match data
Sep 3, 1999* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Slava Dosedel #95 7-5 6-1 6-3 Fernando Meligeni #27 Match data
May 3, 1998* Prague ATP 250 F Clay Fernando Meligeni #75 6-1 6-4 Slava Dosedel #47 Match data
Jun 16, 1994* St. Poelten ATP 250 R32 Clay Slava Dosedel #32 4-6 6-4 7-5 Fernando Meligeni #89 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Slava Dosedel #1,027 #26 1,122 1,825 190 184 50.8% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Fernando Meligeni #675 #25 1,316 1,888 185 199 48.2% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Slava Dosedel Fernando Meligeni
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1989 0–2 0.0% #265 1,468 0 0 1991 2–2 50.0% #206 1,514 0 0
1990 1–3 25.0% #146 1,467 0 0 1992 3–4 42.9% #169 1,497 0 0
1991 4–13 23.5% #201 1,444 0 0 1993 6–7 46.2% #99 1,554 0 0
1992 3–3 50.0% #159 1,497 0 0 1994 14–19 42.4% #91 1,599 0 0
1993 16–15 51.6% #68 1,595 0 0 1995 22–18 55.0% #64 1,696 0 1
1994 36–23 61.0% #29 1,731 0 0 1996 13–16 44.8% #94 1,651 0 2
1995 27–25 51.9% #60 1,695 0 1 1997 24–19 55.8% #67 1,710 0 2
1996 21–13 61.8% #66 1,769 0 2 1998 18–20 47.4% #57 1,655 0 3
1997 24–18 57.1% #43 1,762 0 3 1999 27–26 50.9% #29 1,685 0 3
1998 21–21 50.0% #64 1,690 0 3 2000 14–21 40.0% #100 1,622 0 3
1999 15–12 55.6% #63 1,741 0 3 2001 17–16 51.5% #71 1,709 0 3
2000 17–20 45.9% #64 1,722 0 3 2002 19–23 45.2% #74 1,651 0 3
2001 5–16 23.8% #152 1,575 0 3 2003 6–8 42.9% #210 1,638 0 3