H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Slava Dosedel vs Fernando Vicente H2H: 3-0
Slava Dosedel holds a 3–0 lead over Fernando Vicente in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Slava Dosedel leads 3–0 on clay. Most recently, Slava Dosedel won the 2001 Mallorca fourth round 6-3 0-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 49
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 2001* | Mallorca | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Slava Dosedel | 6-3 0-6 6-1 | Fernando Vicente | Match data |
| Jul 8, 1999* | Bastad | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Slava Dosedel | 5-7 7-5 6-2 | Fernando Vicente | Match data |
| Apr 30, 1999* | Prague | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Slava Dosedel | 7-6(4) 6-4 | Fernando Vicente | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slava Dosedel | #1,027 | #26 | 1,122 | 1,825 | 190 | 184 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Fernando Vicente | #1,019 | #29 | 993 | 1,762 | 158 | 212 | 42.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Slava Dosedel | Fernando Vicente | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #151 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #121 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #201 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #49 | 1,638 | 0 | 1 |
| 1993 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #68 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 23–31 | 42.6% | #47 | 1,615 | 0 | 2 |
| 1994 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #29 | 1,731 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #52 | 1,637 | 0 | 3 |
| 1995 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,695 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #58 | 1,618 | 0 | 3 |
| 1996 | 21–13 | 61.8% | #66 | 1,769 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 20–29 | 40.8% | #63 | 1,600 | 0 | 3 |
| 1997 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #43 | 1,762 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #187 | 1,593 | 0 | 3 |
| 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,690 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #110 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 |
| 1999 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #63 | 1,741 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #111 | 1,461 | 0 | 3 |
| 2000 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #64 | 1,722 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #168 | 1,508 | 0 | 3 |
| 2001 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #152 | 1,575 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #206 | 1,484 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #420 | 1,489 | 0 | 3 |